1 00:00:09,049 --> 00:00:06,410 good evening everybody wow that's 2 00:00:12,020 --> 00:00:09,059 interesting we're gonna let some echo 3 00:00:14,570 --> 00:00:12,030 here there we go thank you Thomas okay 4 00:00:16,790 --> 00:00:14,580 evening everybody and welcome to the 5 00:00:19,519 --> 00:00:16,800 Hubble Space Telescope public lecture 6 00:00:22,580 --> 00:00:19,529 series I'm your host dr. Frank summers 7 00:00:24,290 --> 00:00:22,590 of the office of public outreach and it 8 00:00:27,380 --> 00:00:24,300 is my pleasure to be your host every 9 00:00:30,230 --> 00:00:27,390 month and also to give away free 10 00:00:32,990 --> 00:00:30,240 pictures we have a brand new lithograph 11 00:00:34,639 --> 00:00:33,000 this never been given out before at the 12 00:00:36,170 --> 00:00:34,649 public electro series you know those of 13 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:36,180 you who've been here many times say oh 14 00:00:40,130 --> 00:00:38,489 it's another one another galaxy picture 15 00:00:42,670 --> 00:00:40,140 that I've got well this one is one you 16 00:00:46,850 --> 00:00:42,680 haven't got it's a galaxy cluster Abell 17 00:00:50,209 --> 00:00:46,860 2744 a very special galaxy cluster 18 00:00:53,420 --> 00:00:50,219 because it's the first cluster in the 19 00:00:55,069 --> 00:00:53,430 frontier fields project okay and so you 20 00:00:57,350 --> 00:00:55,079 get the picture of this galaxy cluster 21 00:01:00,319 --> 00:00:57,360 it's special because it is a very very 22 00:01:02,689 --> 00:01:00,329 large galaxy cluster it produces 23 00:01:05,990 --> 00:01:02,699 gravitational lensing alright which 24 00:01:07,399 --> 00:01:06,000 helps us to see very distant galaxies 25 00:01:09,580 --> 00:01:07,409 that are magnified by the gravitational 26 00:01:12,350 --> 00:01:09,590 lens you want to learn about that idea 27 00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:12,360 we've got information on the back that 28 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:14,850 you can read about there's at least a 29 00:01:18,859 --> 00:01:16,530 couple left if you had did not get one 30 00:01:23,810 --> 00:01:18,869 on the way in please pick one up on the 31 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:23,820 way out our talk tonight by Mark 32 00:01:29,149 --> 00:01:25,530 kamionkowski which I spelled wrong 33 00:01:35,770 --> 00:01:29,159 obviously Kamino Kowski sorry about that 34 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:35,780 mark a telegram from the early universe 35 00:01:41,030 --> 00:01:38,850 okay upcoming next month 36 00:01:45,499 --> 00:01:41,040 Joshua peak will be talking about outer 37 00:01:47,210 --> 00:01:45,509 space basically talking about the 38 00:01:50,270 --> 00:01:47,220 emptiness that's out there and what's 39 00:01:52,609 --> 00:01:50,280 actually in the space between the stars 40 00:01:57,530 --> 00:01:52,619 it's not really as empty as you may 41 00:02:00,080 --> 00:01:57,540 think January this auditorium is going 42 00:02:01,940 --> 00:02:00,090 to undergo some renovations okay there 43 00:02:05,270 --> 00:02:01,950 will be some renovations and so the 44 00:02:07,219 --> 00:02:05,280 first week in January I was told I could 45 00:02:09,770 --> 00:02:07,229 not hold the public lecture series so we 46 00:02:13,290 --> 00:02:09,780 are holding it on the second Tuesday in 47 00:02:15,540 --> 00:02:13,300 January so January 13th 2015 48 00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:15,550 and it will be a fascinating topic by 49 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:19,450 some amazing astronomer basically the 50 00:02:24,900 --> 00:02:21,010 astronomer to be named later 51 00:02:26,850 --> 00:02:24,910 that don't worry I get there okay it's 52 00:02:27,750 --> 00:02:26,860 been a little busy this month but we'll 53 00:02:31,260 --> 00:02:27,760 get there 54 00:02:34,230 --> 00:02:31,270 in February we have hey one of the 55 00:02:36,540 --> 00:02:34,240 longed longer titles of topics that have 56 00:02:38,970 --> 00:02:36,550 been given to me from cosmic birth to 57 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:38,980 living earth the next great space 58 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:42,730 telescope beyond JWST if you come to 59 00:02:46,140 --> 00:02:44,170 these you know we've talked a lot about 60 00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:46,150 the next great observatory the James 61 00:02:51,810 --> 00:02:48,370 Webb Space Telescope for those who are 62 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:51,820 wondering what's beyond even that Jason 63 00:02:58,680 --> 00:02:54,370 Tomlinson will elucidate you in February 64 00:03:02,220 --> 00:02:58,690 of next year okay these are listed on 65 00:03:04,350 --> 00:03:02,230 our website easiest thing to do is just 66 00:03:06,060 --> 00:03:04,360 say Hubble public talks into your 67 00:03:07,860 --> 00:03:06,070 favorite search engine this should be 68 00:03:11,340 --> 00:03:07,870 come up you can see we've got the 69 00:03:15,420 --> 00:03:11,350 upcoming lectures as well as the archive 70 00:03:18,449 --> 00:03:15,430 back to 2005 so that's nine years of 71 00:03:20,970 --> 00:03:18,459 amazing cosmic knowledge that you can 72 00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:20,980 absorb by watching all of our webcasts 73 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:21,370 okay 74 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:23,050 just think how smart you would be 75 00:03:28,830 --> 00:03:25,690 watching nine years of cosmic knowledge 76 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:28,840 that'll anyway so that's available for 77 00:03:34,470 --> 00:03:32,530 you we have emails I just got one 78 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:34,480 tonight of somebody who was on our email 79 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:36,850 list and some for some reason got off of 80 00:03:43,199 --> 00:03:38,770 it so she gave me your email address 81 00:03:45,290 --> 00:03:43,209 I'll add her and you won't get any spam 82 00:03:48,390 --> 00:03:45,300 from it because it's very very low 83 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:48,400 emails you can contact us public lecture 84 00:03:54,060 --> 00:03:51,370 at STScI dot edu asks us comments 85 00:03:55,350 --> 00:03:54,070 questions or even sign up for the 86 00:03:57,270 --> 00:03:55,360 announcements because if you send us an 87 00:04:01,830 --> 00:03:57,280 email we'll have your return address to 88 00:04:05,550 --> 00:04:01,840 do it social media Facebook Twitter 89 00:04:08,370 --> 00:04:05,560 Google+ Pinterest I'm on Facebook 90 00:04:09,660 --> 00:04:08,380 Google+ and sometimes I Twitter I don't 91 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:09,670 do as much of the social media as I'm 92 00:04:15,390 --> 00:04:13,090 supposed to but it's there if you are so 93 00:04:17,550 --> 00:04:15,400 interested in it 94 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:17,560 Observatory I'm not sure that they are 95 00:04:21,030 --> 00:04:19,090 doing the observatory tonight because 96 00:04:23,850 --> 00:04:21,040 they had it planned scheduled for last 97 00:04:26,070 --> 00:04:23,860 week and so there's a big question mark 98 00:04:27,620 --> 00:04:26,080 anybody from the spacecraft Sara Torre 99 00:04:29,969 --> 00:04:27,630 here 100 00:04:31,589 --> 00:04:29,979 hearing silence I will assume that they 101 00:04:32,790 --> 00:04:31,599 are not going to do the observatory 102 00:04:34,620 --> 00:04:32,800 tonight 103 00:04:36,749 --> 00:04:34,630 I'll ask them remind me to ask again at 104 00:04:38,879 --> 00:04:36,759 the end of the lecture in case the MS I 105 00:04:43,170 --> 00:04:38,889 mean if Maryland spacecraft or folks do 106 00:04:44,909 --> 00:04:43,180 show up okay so my favorite part of the 107 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:44,919 evening is the news from the universe 108 00:04:55,710 --> 00:04:50,250 this is for November 2014 to Pluto and 109 00:04:57,150 --> 00:04:55,720 Beyond part two when last we discussed 110 00:04:59,460 --> 00:04:57,160 of course when we're talking about going 111 00:05:00,689 --> 00:04:59,470 to Pluto we are talking about the New 112 00:05:05,999 --> 00:05:00,699 Horizons mission 113 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:06,009 New Horizons launched back in 2006 114 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:09,250 it got went past Jupiter in 2007 has 115 00:05:16,439 --> 00:05:12,250 been cruising out towards Pluto for the 116 00:05:18,409 --> 00:05:16,449 past nine years and will finally get to 117 00:05:21,990 --> 00:05:18,419 Pluto next summer 118 00:05:25,740 --> 00:05:22,000 so here is the path of the New Horizons 119 00:05:27,809 --> 00:05:25,750 full trajectory as it was in July when I 120 00:05:31,890 --> 00:05:27,819 first presented part one of this and 121 00:05:34,589 --> 00:05:31,900 part one oh and just to mention the the 122 00:05:35,510 --> 00:05:34,599 milestones sometime January or shortly 123 00:05:37,980 --> 00:05:35,520 thereafter 124 00:05:42,420 --> 00:05:37,990 New Horizons will have better resolution 125 00:05:44,159 --> 00:05:42,430 than Hubble does okay so all of next 126 00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:44,169 year the time for New Horizons is 127 00:05:47,399 --> 00:05:46,090 precious because they will have better 128 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:47,409 resolution the Hubble these are some 129 00:05:51,870 --> 00:05:49,810 Hubble images of Pluto where you can see 130 00:05:53,879 --> 00:05:51,880 the pixelation of it all right and 131 00:05:55,860 --> 00:05:53,889 that's the that's that's that's the best 132 00:05:58,100 --> 00:05:55,870 Hubble can do in terms of getting 133 00:06:00,779 --> 00:05:58,110 individual pictures we can of course 134 00:06:03,570 --> 00:06:00,789 interpolate from them to get better maps 135 00:06:07,439 --> 00:06:03,580 but next summer for next year we'll be 136 00:06:10,740 --> 00:06:07,449 able to get that it'll go past Pluto on 137 00:06:14,159 --> 00:06:10,750 July 14th best deal day next summer 138 00:06:16,260 --> 00:06:14,169 we'll do a buzz over Pluto it will be 139 00:06:19,290 --> 00:06:16,270 moving however really really really fast 140 00:06:21,510 --> 00:06:19,300 so this is going to be very carefully 141 00:06:23,490 --> 00:06:21,520 and planned encounter of everything and 142 00:06:25,740 --> 00:06:23,500 Hubble has been helping by searching 143 00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:25,750 through the Pluto system discovering the 144 00:06:31,679 --> 00:06:30,130 moons Nix Hydra sticks and Kerberos for 145 00:06:34,949 --> 00:06:31,689 extra moons of 146 00:06:39,059 --> 00:06:34,959 of Pluto that Hubble has been able thing 147 00:06:41,429 --> 00:06:39,069 but after it passes by Pluto what next 148 00:06:44,309 --> 00:06:41,439 well this is where the Kuiper belt comes 149 00:06:46,229 --> 00:06:44,319 in and you can see that what we have 150 00:06:48,149 --> 00:06:46,239 here in the interior is the orbits of 151 00:06:50,189 --> 00:06:48,159 Jupiter Saturn Uranus and Neptune the 152 00:06:53,339 --> 00:06:50,199 giant planets in the solar system all of 153 00:06:54,929 --> 00:06:53,349 those white and red objects are new 154 00:06:56,609 --> 00:06:54,939 objects that have been discovered in the 155 00:07:00,539 --> 00:06:56,619 Kuiper belt below the solar system since 156 00:07:02,509 --> 00:07:00,549 1993 well I say all of them but one of 157 00:07:07,619 --> 00:07:02,519 course Pluto was discovered in 1930 158 00:07:10,709 --> 00:07:07,629 they're 12 1274 as of July this summer 159 00:07:13,769 --> 00:07:10,719 and so the question is we're gonna zoom 160 00:07:17,100 --> 00:07:13,779 past Pluto what do we do afterwards can 161 00:07:20,999 --> 00:07:17,110 we find a suitable Kuiper belt object to 162 00:07:23,429 --> 00:07:21,009 fly past afterwards so Hubble showed 163 00:07:25,589 --> 00:07:23,439 that it could do it and NASA gave us the 164 00:07:29,059 --> 00:07:25,599 go-ahead to do a complete search for 165 00:07:31,979 --> 00:07:29,069 Kuiper belt objects that would be 166 00:07:36,869 --> 00:07:31,989 obtainable with the current orbit of the 167 00:07:39,329 --> 00:07:36,879 mission so they looked at 83 Hubble with 168 00:07:42,629 --> 00:07:39,339 c3 fields okay and this is the tile 169 00:07:45,779 --> 00:07:42,639 mosaic of all these 83 fields that they 170 00:07:47,669 --> 00:07:45,789 looked in and on the lower left-hand 171 00:07:49,649 --> 00:07:47,679 corner is the size of the full moon on 172 00:07:52,439 --> 00:07:49,659 the sky and so you can see that they 173 00:07:56,309 --> 00:07:52,449 covered an area about half the size of a 174 00:07:58,559 --> 00:07:56,319 full moon in total looking for potential 175 00:08:00,899 --> 00:07:58,569 Kuiper belt objects that the New 176 00:08:03,979 --> 00:08:00,909 Horizons mission could visit they 177 00:08:08,129 --> 00:08:03,989 discovered three that were really 178 00:08:10,109 --> 00:08:08,139 obtainable potential targets and so if 179 00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:10,119 you take those blue as the whipsey three 180 00:08:14,909 --> 00:08:12,610 fields and then the purple as a single 181 00:08:16,949 --> 00:08:14,919 with c3 field and then you zoom into 182 00:08:19,889 --> 00:08:16,959 that red region you can see how just a 183 00:08:22,759 --> 00:08:19,899 small piece of that they had to do and 184 00:08:25,259 --> 00:08:22,769 you can see the five separate images are 185 00:08:28,709 --> 00:08:25,269 different exposures you take multiple 186 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:28,719 exposures separated by time and then the 187 00:08:32,689 --> 00:08:30,610 nearby objects the object in our solar 188 00:08:35,610 --> 00:08:32,699 system will move across the exposure 189 00:08:38,189 --> 00:08:35,620 creating those five separate images so 190 00:08:41,129 --> 00:08:38,199 here is what they call PT one potential 191 00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:41,139 target one you can see it's real name is 192 00:08:49,560 --> 00:08:44,770 one one one zero one one three why 193 00:08:51,180 --> 00:08:49,570 which is why we call it PT 1 and this is 194 00:08:54,290 --> 00:08:51,190 one of the this this is the favored 195 00:08:57,240 --> 00:08:54,300 target for New Horizons to mission 196 00:08:59,250 --> 00:08:57,250 mission mission to visit after going 197 00:09:01,260 --> 00:08:59,260 past Pluto so as I said there are three 198 00:09:04,820 --> 00:09:01,270 potential targets size estimates for 199 00:09:07,949 --> 00:09:04,830 these are between 25 and 55 kilometers 200 00:09:09,420 --> 00:09:07,959 one of them is definitely reachable and 201 00:09:11,910 --> 00:09:09,430 when we say definitely reachable the 202 00:09:15,449 --> 00:09:11,920 idea is that we need enough propulsion 203 00:09:17,639 --> 00:09:15,459 to shift the orbit to shift the the path 204 00:09:20,610 --> 00:09:17,649 of New Horizons to go past this object 205 00:09:22,199 --> 00:09:20,620 right and so given the constraints of 206 00:09:25,769 --> 00:09:22,209 the propellant and stuff we have on 207 00:09:27,420 --> 00:09:25,779 board can we shift it and so one is 208 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:27,430 definitely reachable two of them are 209 00:09:33,420 --> 00:09:31,810 potentially accessible but just because 210 00:09:35,010 --> 00:09:33,430 we found potential targets doesn't mean 211 00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:35,020 that New Horizons is actually going to 212 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:38,050 go there nASA has to approve and fund 213 00:09:42,990 --> 00:09:40,450 the extension of the mission the mission 214 00:09:45,199 --> 00:09:43,000 is funded through the Pluto of the Pluto 215 00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:45,209 flyby and all the analysis of that data 216 00:09:50,610 --> 00:09:48,370 NASA must secure must approve the 217 00:09:52,319 --> 00:09:50,620 funding for that so they're going to go 218 00:09:55,050 --> 00:09:52,329 through the entire year next year and 219 00:09:57,060 --> 00:09:55,060 somewhere around in early 2016 the 220 00:09:59,490 --> 00:09:57,070 decision will be made whether or not 221 00:10:05,880 --> 00:09:59,500 they're going to go and look at a second 222 00:10:08,370 --> 00:10:05,890 object no worries of a collision - the 223 00:10:10,949 --> 00:10:08,380 question was no there was no it's pretty 224 00:10:16,710 --> 00:10:10,959 pretty pretty really totally empty out 225 00:10:18,900 --> 00:10:16,720 there I mean it's well you're used to if 226 00:10:21,060 --> 00:10:18,910 you ever if you saw Star Wars you know 227 00:10:23,819 --> 00:10:21,070 how dense the asteroid belt isn't 228 00:10:26,069 --> 00:10:23,829 because as spaceships zooming through 229 00:10:28,470 --> 00:10:26,079 the asteroid belt is pure fiction 230 00:10:30,510 --> 00:10:28,480 okay if you fly through the asteroid 231 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:30,520 belt you will never ever know that 232 00:10:35,190 --> 00:10:32,770 you're inside the asteroid belt because 233 00:10:37,680 --> 00:10:35,200 it's just incredibly amounts of space in 234 00:10:39,269 --> 00:10:37,690 between the asteroids okay same thing 235 00:10:41,460 --> 00:10:39,279 even more true for the Kuiper belt 236 00:10:42,870 --> 00:10:41,470 objects okay incredible amounts of space 237 00:10:45,449 --> 00:10:42,880 in between them so you have to work 238 00:10:50,100 --> 00:10:45,459 really really really hard in order to 239 00:10:53,939 --> 00:10:50,110 fly past one of these okay here is just 240 00:10:55,940 --> 00:10:53,949 for example the potential target one 30 241 00:10:58,820 --> 00:10:55,950 to 45 kilometers in diameter 242 00:11:01,940 --> 00:10:58,830 compared to asteroid eros that we flew 243 00:11:05,150 --> 00:11:01,950 past and rubber ducky also known as 244 00:11:06,650 --> 00:11:05,160 comet cherammal of Gerasimenko this is 245 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:06,660 the rosetta target which is only four 246 00:11:12,110 --> 00:11:08,970 kilometers in diameter and of course 247 00:11:14,060 --> 00:11:12,120 rubber ducky is going to get visited is 248 00:11:16,340 --> 00:11:14,070 currently being visited but it'll have a 249 00:11:21,110 --> 00:11:16,350 lander tomorrow I'll wait a question 250 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:21,120 there get in there in just a second okay 251 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:22,410 good question 252 00:11:30,020 --> 00:11:26,850 how much further away is it well so here 253 00:11:33,320 --> 00:11:30,030 is an artist's depiction of it and so 254 00:11:35,150 --> 00:11:33,330 this is the idea of what it might look 255 00:11:36,190 --> 00:11:35,160 like this Kuiper belt object way out at 256 00:11:39,470 --> 00:11:36,200 the edge of space 257 00:11:43,490 --> 00:11:39,480 and the idea is that it's supposed to be 258 00:11:45,860 --> 00:11:43,500 here but this is of course fantasy this 259 00:11:48,620 --> 00:11:45,870 is not even scientifically correct it's 260 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:48,630 a nice idea but you recognize when I 261 00:11:52,490 --> 00:11:50,490 showed you that path that New Horizons 262 00:11:56,450 --> 00:11:52,500 is that has been going straight past 263 00:12:00,890 --> 00:11:56,460 Pluto and Pluto is about three billion 264 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:00,900 miles out from the Sun and this new 265 00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:03,530 object is about four billion miles out 266 00:12:08,750 --> 00:12:06,090 so the problem with this diagram is that 267 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:08,760 that object should be moved over to the 268 00:12:13,100 --> 00:12:11,370 end of that green line and actually if 269 00:12:14,630 --> 00:12:13,110 you're looking back at the Sun from that 270 00:12:17,060 --> 00:12:14,640 object you should be seeing Pluto in a 271 00:12:18,260 --> 00:12:17,070 direct line with the Sun because New 272 00:12:21,250 --> 00:12:18,270 Horizons is not going to be able to 273 00:12:23,300 --> 00:12:21,260 change its its its path very much so 274 00:12:25,250 --> 00:12:23,310 it's alright it's just an artist 275 00:12:27,710 --> 00:12:25,260 rendition here but the point is is that 276 00:12:30,350 --> 00:12:27,720 it's about four billion miles out so 277 00:12:32,750 --> 00:12:30,360 after traveling three billion miles over 278 00:12:34,460 --> 00:12:32,760 course of ten years it's gonna have to 279 00:12:35,990 --> 00:12:34,470 travel another billion miles to get 280 00:12:37,610 --> 00:12:36,000 there which will take another three 281 00:12:39,620 --> 00:12:37,620 years three or four years to get there 282 00:12:44,620 --> 00:12:39,630 okay which is the question I think you 283 00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:44,630 were really asking right right okay okay 284 00:12:50,450 --> 00:12:47,850 next topic a close encounter of the 285 00:12:52,130 --> 00:12:50,460 fourth planet kind this is another 286 00:12:52,790 --> 00:12:52,140 revisit of a story that we've been 287 00:12:56,420 --> 00:12:52,800 following 288 00:12:59,140 --> 00:12:56,430 of course comet siding spring siding 289 00:13:03,850 --> 00:12:59,150 spring which flew past Mars last month 290 00:13:07,130 --> 00:13:03,860 this is a Damien peach the guy gets 291 00:13:08,630 --> 00:13:07,140 amazingly good comet pictures Danny 292 00:13:09,590 --> 00:13:08,640 peach this is a picture of comet siding 293 00:13:14,210 --> 00:13:09,600 spring from Fair 294 00:13:18,110 --> 00:13:14,220 of last year and of course in October it 295 00:13:20,030 --> 00:13:18,120 flew past Mars and this this it's on 296 00:13:22,490 --> 00:13:20,040 this giant looping orbit it's got like a 297 00:13:23,930 --> 00:13:22,500 million year orbit okay and it's coming 298 00:13:25,580 --> 00:13:23,940 down underneath the solar system and 299 00:13:28,160 --> 00:13:25,590 back up through it and it just happens 300 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:28,170 to pass by the orbit of Mars and Mars 301 00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:30,450 just happened to be there at the same 302 00:13:33,410 --> 00:13:32,490 time it was passing by incredible 303 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:33,420 coincidence 304 00:13:38,420 --> 00:13:35,850 this doesn't do it justice it actually 305 00:13:42,500 --> 00:13:38,430 came within twenty Mars diameters of 306 00:13:45,350 --> 00:13:42,510 Mars on there and so of course is 307 00:13:48,380 --> 00:13:45,360 there's gonna a on the scale of the 308 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:48,390 solar system that's amazingly close all 309 00:13:52,340 --> 00:13:50,130 right so we're wondering was there going 310 00:13:55,030 --> 00:13:52,350 to be any problems this is an artist's 311 00:13:57,620 --> 00:13:55,040 depiction of the comet flying past Mars 312 00:13:59,840 --> 00:13:57,630 and this was to illustrate the idea that 313 00:14:03,920 --> 00:13:59,850 NASA was going to do a Duck and Cover 314 00:14:06,140 --> 00:14:03,930 take the three spacecrafts that we have 315 00:14:07,550 --> 00:14:06,150 in orbit around Mars and make sure they 316 00:14:09,140 --> 00:14:07,560 were on the far side of the planet at 317 00:14:13,130 --> 00:14:09,150 the proper time so that they wouldn't 318 00:14:16,420 --> 00:14:13,140 get hit but this was overly optimistic 319 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:16,430 in terms of the size of the coma of the 320 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:19,770 spacecraft of the comet it wasn't nearly 321 00:14:23,420 --> 00:14:21,090 any that big 322 00:14:26,300 --> 00:14:23,430 there wasn't any huge problems with it 323 00:14:27,860 --> 00:14:26,310 and after the flyby they put up this 324 00:14:31,130 --> 00:14:27,870 webpage saying everything's in good 325 00:14:33,680 --> 00:14:31,140 health MRO maven and Odyssey are all in 326 00:14:34,490 --> 00:14:33,690 good health no problems there wasn't 327 00:14:36,710 --> 00:14:34,500 really something we were sweating 328 00:14:38,390 --> 00:14:36,720 amazingly but you know if the coma had 329 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:38,400 been really really big there could have 330 00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:40,770 been some serious problems what we were 331 00:14:47,540 --> 00:14:44,370 interested also in is the ones on the 332 00:14:49,580 --> 00:14:47,550 surface could they look up and see an 333 00:14:51,740 --> 00:14:49,590 observation of a comet from another 334 00:14:57,140 --> 00:14:51,750 planet first observation of a comet from 335 00:15:00,880 --> 00:14:57,150 another planet and they got it it's not 336 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:00,890 that impressive but they did get it okay 337 00:15:07,630 --> 00:15:03,930 so that in the center is comet siding 338 00:15:11,450 --> 00:15:07,640 spring as seen from the surface of Mars 339 00:15:13,790 --> 00:15:11,460 so that's a cool image not very detailed 340 00:15:16,100 --> 00:15:13,800 in anything if you want a really good 341 00:15:18,140 --> 00:15:16,110 image unfortunately this the the the 342 00:15:19,670 --> 00:15:18,150 missions at Mars did not get the good 343 00:15:21,710 --> 00:15:19,680 image where are we gonna get the good 344 00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:21,720 image we're gonna go back to Damian 345 00:15:26,100 --> 00:15:22,570 peach because 346 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:26,110 gets the coolest pictures okay so on the 347 00:15:29,340 --> 00:15:27,250 right hand side that thing with the 348 00:15:30,660 --> 00:15:29,350 spikes that looks like a star it's not a 349 00:15:33,650 --> 00:15:30,670 star that's Mars 350 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:33,660 that's how amazingly bright Mars is 351 00:15:37,770 --> 00:15:36,970 compared to comet siding spring 's lower 352 00:15:42,060 --> 00:15:37,780 left of it 353 00:15:44,430 --> 00:15:42,070 okay so again just like for comet Ison 354 00:15:48,030 --> 00:15:44,440 the best comp ixr seem to always come 355 00:15:49,260 --> 00:15:48,040 from Damian peach he's done I don't know 356 00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:49,270 how he does it I've never been an 357 00:15:54,210 --> 00:15:51,970 amateur astronomer I've never been a 358 00:15:56,730 --> 00:15:54,220 telescopic astronomer or an astro 359 00:15:58,920 --> 00:15:56,740 photographer but he gets the gets the 360 00:16:01,050 --> 00:15:58,930 cool things all right so this shows you 361 00:16:04,050 --> 00:16:01,060 the correct relative brightness of them 362 00:16:08,010 --> 00:16:04,060 all right and it also gives you a clue 363 00:16:11,570 --> 00:16:08,020 as to what this image is this is a 364 00:16:13,740 --> 00:16:11,580 Hubble image but it is a composite okay 365 00:16:15,540 --> 00:16:13,750 way too many people on the internet that 366 00:16:18,060 --> 00:16:15,550 thought this was a single image all 367 00:16:20,130 --> 00:16:18,070 right and if you look at this okay go 368 00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:20,140 back to this you can see there's no way 369 00:16:23,730 --> 00:16:21,970 you can get Mars in the same exposure 370 00:16:26,580 --> 00:16:23,740 anywhere near that you can get the comet 371 00:16:30,450 --> 00:16:26,590 so what Hubble did here is Hubble took 372 00:16:32,580 --> 00:16:30,460 separate images of Mars and of the comet 373 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:32,590 all right so that it could do the 374 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:34,450 exposure level correctly for each and 375 00:16:41,100 --> 00:16:37,450 then we mosaic them together to show the 376 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:41,110 correct relative scale okay so you can 377 00:16:45,690 --> 00:16:43,210 see this is the 20 Mars diameters across 378 00:16:48,270 --> 00:16:45,700 right all right but that's the scale of 379 00:16:50,220 --> 00:16:48,280 the coma of the comet and you can see 380 00:16:54,030 --> 00:16:50,230 it's not quite big enough to really have 381 00:16:56,940 --> 00:16:54,040 caused major havoc at Mars so we had a 382 00:16:59,280 --> 00:16:56,950 really really close approach between two 383 00:17:01,530 --> 00:16:59,290 objects in the solar system on the 384 00:17:03,540 --> 00:17:01,540 scales of billions of miles they were 385 00:17:05,460 --> 00:17:03,550 coming in you know at just a hundred 386 00:17:08,250 --> 00:17:05,470 thousandth of my hundred thousand a 387 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:08,260 hundred thousand miles but even then it 388 00:17:13,650 --> 00:17:10,650 wasn't enough to cause any major havoc 389 00:17:17,220 --> 00:17:13,660 so it was it was an interesting event 390 00:17:22,980 --> 00:17:17,230 but nothing nothing Mars shattering how 391 00:17:27,390 --> 00:17:22,990 about that all right finally the coolest 392 00:17:28,770 --> 00:17:27,400 image I have seen in years and I call it 393 00:17:30,360 --> 00:17:28,780 mining the gaps 394 00:17:32,040 --> 00:17:30,370 and those have you been to London 395 00:17:36,540 --> 00:17:32,050 understand what I'm talking about 396 00:17:40,050 --> 00:17:36,550 so we have for many years been seeing 397 00:17:43,860 --> 00:17:40,060 disks of material around newborn stars 398 00:17:46,140 --> 00:17:43,870 okay young stars as we as a as a cloud 399 00:17:49,050 --> 00:17:46,150 of dust material collapses to form a 400 00:17:51,030 --> 00:17:49,060 star it forms a disk around it and here 401 00:17:53,460 --> 00:17:51,040 you can see on the left au microscopy 402 00:17:56,010 --> 00:17:53,470 where we see the edge on of the disk and 403 00:17:59,010 --> 00:17:56,020 on the right HD 107 146 where we see the 404 00:18:00,420 --> 00:17:59,020 face onto these disks okay and this the 405 00:18:01,950 --> 00:18:00,430 star in the centre of course is blocked 406 00:18:04,230 --> 00:18:01,960 out by a coronagraph so you can actually 407 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:04,240 see the disk disk of material around it 408 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:08,890 and so we're seeing these disks and they 409 00:18:12,630 --> 00:18:10,810 can be sometimes kind of ratty but you 410 00:18:14,160 --> 00:18:12,640 know we can see in the top and the 411 00:18:15,990 --> 00:18:14,170 bottom here we've got the observation 412 00:18:18,030 --> 00:18:16,000 from Hubble and the bottom is the 413 00:18:19,980 --> 00:18:18,040 artist's interpretation to help you 414 00:18:22,470 --> 00:18:19,990 guide your eye in terms of seeing these 415 00:18:24,690 --> 00:18:22,480 disks around these objects and so we're 416 00:18:27,810 --> 00:18:24,700 finally seeing lots and lots of these 417 00:18:29,930 --> 00:18:27,820 disks we're confirming that star and 418 00:18:33,540 --> 00:18:29,940 plant information goes through a disk 419 00:18:35,940 --> 00:18:33,550 furthermore in some places such as foam 420 00:18:38,460 --> 00:18:35,950 alot we're seeing these rings and you 421 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:38,470 see this thin ring out here and this 422 00:18:45,900 --> 00:18:42,010 ring at foam a lot okay was indicative 423 00:18:47,940 --> 00:18:45,910 of the idea that planets had formed one 424 00:18:50,190 --> 00:18:47,950 because it was a nice thin ring and you 425 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:50,200 need a gravitational body to create that 426 00:18:54,750 --> 00:18:52,450 ring and to because that ring was 427 00:18:56,550 --> 00:18:54,760 slightly off center and a gravitational 428 00:18:59,010 --> 00:18:56,560 pull of a planet could have pulled it 429 00:19:03,230 --> 00:18:59,020 off center and so info a lot we went in 430 00:19:05,460 --> 00:19:03,240 looking and we found a planet okay that 431 00:19:06,930 --> 00:19:05,470 potentially could cause it and we 432 00:19:11,190 --> 00:19:06,940 believe that that that is the planet 433 00:19:14,010 --> 00:19:11,200 that caused the the ring there now 434 00:19:16,350 --> 00:19:14,020 Hubble has great resolution okay it does 435 00:19:18,540 --> 00:19:16,360 amazing things but there's a new 436 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:18,550 telescope that has just come online oops 437 00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:20,650 I'm sorry I forgot about that this other 438 00:19:24,360 --> 00:19:21,850 thing there's one other observation I 439 00:19:27,150 --> 00:19:24,370 wanted to do in the setup is the Keck 440 00:19:29,550 --> 00:19:27,160 Observatory okay this is the star the 441 00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:29,560 disk around beta Pictoris the Hubble 442 00:19:32,850 --> 00:19:31,090 observations on the bottom and the 443 00:19:35,670 --> 00:19:32,860 center of the thing up top you can 444 00:19:37,650 --> 00:19:35,680 actually start to see lumps in the the 445 00:19:39,150 --> 00:19:37,660 disc now this is an edge-on disc and you 446 00:19:40,770 --> 00:19:39,160 can see lumps in it where you think that 447 00:19:42,270 --> 00:19:40,780 planets might start 448 00:19:45,150 --> 00:19:42,280 start forming so we're beginning to see 449 00:19:47,520 --> 00:19:45,160 not just the disks and these rings and 450 00:19:49,050 --> 00:19:47,530 these lumps within the Rings to try and 451 00:19:51,660 --> 00:19:49,060 indicate the possibility of planet 452 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:51,670 formation within them right but there's 453 00:19:58,590 --> 00:19:54,690 a new telescope on the Atacama Desert at 454 00:20:00,870 --> 00:19:58,600 15,000 feet in Chile and this is a 455 00:20:02,910 --> 00:20:00,880 millimeter wave observatory it's called 456 00:20:05,940 --> 00:20:02,920 the Atacama Large millimeter or array 457 00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:05,950 and with it they can separate their 458 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:09,250 dishes by up to 15 kilometres they can 459 00:20:14,700 --> 00:20:12,010 synthesize a telescope that's 15 460 00:20:17,040 --> 00:20:14,710 kilometers in length and this is the 461 00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:17,050 artist's depiction and here is a shot of 462 00:20:23,460 --> 00:20:20,650 the partially built atacama Alma up up 463 00:20:27,030 --> 00:20:23,470 there and with that they can start 464 00:20:31,530 --> 00:20:27,040 looking at the amazing things so they 465 00:20:40,350 --> 00:20:31,540 looked at a star named HL Tauri ok HL 466 00:20:41,970 --> 00:20:40,360 Tauri I don't have my HL Tauri is 467 00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:41,980 somewhere in here this is a Hubble image 468 00:20:47,270 --> 00:20:44,290 alright you can see that and these eeeh 469 00:20:49,650 --> 00:20:47,280 right in there there is a star HL Tauri 470 00:20:53,040 --> 00:20:49,660 and they looked at it in millimeter 471 00:20:57,450 --> 00:20:53,050 wavelengths and they got an absolutely 472 00:20:59,280 --> 00:20:57,460 amazing image ok in that small region 473 00:21:04,140 --> 00:20:59,290 they were able to see this let me pull 474 00:21:07,770 --> 00:21:04,150 it up full size this is the disc around 475 00:21:11,310 --> 00:21:07,780 a 1 million year old star we can see the 476 00:21:13,580 --> 00:21:11,320 gaps and the ring structures and the 477 00:21:17,460 --> 00:21:13,590 holes in the ring structures which are 478 00:21:20,820 --> 00:21:17,470 incredibly indicative of the formation 479 00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:20,830 of planets in this disc all right we 480 00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:23,650 have never seen a disc in anywhere near 481 00:21:26,850 --> 00:21:26,290 this detail this is an amazing image it 482 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:26,860 floored 483 00:21:31,740 --> 00:21:29,050 all of us we were passing it around if I 484 00:21:33,540 --> 00:21:31,750 email so many astronomers posted it on 485 00:21:36,750 --> 00:21:33,550 Facebook and Google+ all over the place 486 00:21:40,290 --> 00:21:36,760 just a stunning image this is the first 487 00:21:42,900 --> 00:21:40,300 high-res image release from Alma when 488 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:42,910 they're out in the 15 kilometer baseline 489 00:21:46,740 --> 00:21:44,650 mode where they can get the highest 490 00:21:48,870 --> 00:21:46,750 resolution they will actually look in 491 00:21:51,360 --> 00:21:48,880 lower frequencies able to get even 492 00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:51,370 higher resolution than this it just 493 00:21:56,259 --> 00:21:53,690 augers an incredible 494 00:21:58,960 --> 00:21:56,269 credible wealth of information in 495 00:22:03,190 --> 00:21:58,970 millimeter way of astronomy to come from 496 00:22:05,080 --> 00:22:03,200 Alma and this is literally one of the 497 00:22:10,090 --> 00:22:05,090 most amazing images I've seen in years 498 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:10,100 so we're seeing details of plant 499 00:22:21,490 --> 00:22:13,129 formation around other stars really cool 500 00:22:22,629 --> 00:22:21,500 stuff maybe I might be but might may be 501 00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:22,639 flipping that they're gonna look how 502 00:22:24,909 --> 00:22:23,570 about this they look at other 503 00:22:27,389 --> 00:22:24,919 frequencies and get slightly higher 504 00:22:29,499 --> 00:22:27,399 resolution than this how about that I 505 00:22:30,940 --> 00:22:29,509 just think I've been given a teacher 506 00:22:35,499 --> 00:22:30,950 works trough the last two hours I can't 507 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:35,509 think anymore okay so that's the news 508 00:22:40,419 --> 00:22:37,129 from the universe and it's time to move 509 00:22:43,149 --> 00:22:40,429 over to our featured speaker our speaker 510 00:22:45,100 --> 00:22:43,159 tonight is Mark kamionkowski who comes 511 00:22:50,350 --> 00:22:45,110 to us all the way from across the street 512 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:50,360 at the Johns Hopkins University mark got 513 00:22:55,600 --> 00:22:52,610 his undergraduate degree at Washington 514 00:22:57,820 --> 00:22:55,610 University in st. Louis then went on to 515 00:23:01,570 --> 00:22:57,830 get his graduate did his graduate work 516 00:23:05,470 --> 00:23:01,580 at the University of Chicago then went 517 00:23:07,509 --> 00:23:05,480 on to Columbia University where I oh no 518 00:23:09,039 --> 00:23:07,519 I'm sorry he went to Princeton at the 519 00:23:11,669 --> 00:23:09,049 Institute for Advanced Study for a 520 00:23:15,999 --> 00:23:11,679 postdoc and then went up to Columbia 521 00:23:18,279 --> 00:23:16,009 where he gave me half a job after I 522 00:23:20,619 --> 00:23:18,289 finished my postdoc at Princeton I got 523 00:23:22,480 --> 00:23:20,629 half a postdoc at Columbia with Mark and 524 00:23:25,269 --> 00:23:22,490 half a postdoc at the America Museum of 525 00:23:28,330 --> 00:23:25,279 Natural History with Neil Tyson so they 526 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:28,340 shared me for a couple years before I 527 00:23:33,970 --> 00:23:31,850 moved on to M & H fully so obviously 528 00:23:36,789 --> 00:23:33,980 indebted to him for that then he went 529 00:23:40,060 --> 00:23:36,799 out to Caltech professor there and 530 00:23:41,950 --> 00:23:40,070 finally came here to Johns Hopkins he is 531 00:23:44,049 --> 00:23:41,960 definitely one of the world's experts in 532 00:23:45,129 --> 00:23:44,059 the cosmic wave background and really 533 00:23:46,810 --> 00:23:45,139 looking forward to hearing from him 534 00:23:54,730 --> 00:23:46,820 ladies and gentlemen dr. Mark 535 00:24:03,500 --> 00:24:01,370 thank you very much so Frank and I 536 00:24:05,780 --> 00:24:03,510 overlapped for a few years Columbia and 537 00:24:11,840 --> 00:24:05,790 one of the things we did together is try 538 00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:11,850 to figure out why galaxies spin we made 539 00:24:15,850 --> 00:24:14,610 some progress so today I'm going to tell 540 00:24:19,480 --> 00:24:15,860 you about something completely different 541 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:19,490 I'm gonna tell you about some new 542 00:24:26,060 --> 00:24:22,890 measurements that have been made the 543 00:24:29,120 --> 00:24:26,070 results were announced in March and we 544 00:24:30,410 --> 00:24:29,130 may be seeing a signal from the first 545 00:24:31,730 --> 00:24:30,420 trillionth of a trillionth of a 546 00:24:35,150 --> 00:24:31,740 trillionth of a second after the Big 547 00:24:38,030 --> 00:24:35,160 Bang whether we are not still remains to 548 00:24:42,650 --> 00:24:38,040 be determined and I will try to explain 549 00:24:44,270 --> 00:24:42,660 to you the story so just to begin this 550 00:24:45,530 --> 00:24:44,280 was a there was a press conference at 551 00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:45,540 the harvard-smithsonian Center for 552 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:49,890 Astrophysics where the team which is 553 00:24:57,260 --> 00:24:55,410 called I Sept 2 announced discovery of 554 00:25:00,860 --> 00:24:57,270 gravitational waves from the Big Bang 555 00:25:03,020 --> 00:25:00,870 and the harvard-smithsonian Center for 556 00:25:05,390 --> 00:25:03,030 Astrophysics has these types of press 557 00:25:07,220 --> 00:25:05,400 conferences all the time because they're 558 00:25:08,300 --> 00:25:07,230 discovering exoplanets all the time and 559 00:25:09,380 --> 00:25:08,310 this is one of the places where they 560 00:25:12,260 --> 00:25:09,390 announced the discovery of the 561 00:25:14,240 --> 00:25:12,270 exoplanets the response to this 562 00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:14,250 particular news conference though was 563 00:25:18,350 --> 00:25:15,690 unlike anything they had ever seen 564 00:25:20,210 --> 00:25:18,360 before and in fact most people who tried 565 00:25:22,190 --> 00:25:20,220 to log in to the website to watch the 566 00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:22,200 news conference life were unable to do 567 00:25:26,720 --> 00:25:24,330 so because there was such demand to 568 00:25:28,730 --> 00:25:26,730 watch it that the demand actually 569 00:25:32,480 --> 00:25:28,740 brought the Harvard web service to their 570 00:25:34,610 --> 00:25:32,490 knees so it was really really huge it 571 00:25:37,220 --> 00:25:34,620 was written up in Scientific American it 572 00:25:40,190 --> 00:25:37,230 was front page on the New York Times New 573 00:25:42,950 --> 00:25:40,200 Scientist every single news source in 574 00:25:46,130 --> 00:25:42,960 the world covered the story and in 575 00:25:51,950 --> 00:25:46,140 particular through was if I can find it 576 00:25:56,510 --> 00:25:51,960 here this Saturday morning afterwards so 577 00:25:57,650 --> 00:25:56,520 let me play Danny welcome to the show 578 00:25:59,990 --> 00:25:57,660 you're gonna start us off with who's 579 00:26:01,970 --> 00:26:00,000 Karl this time Carl kasell living legend 580 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:01,980 that he is is going to recreate for you 581 00:26:04,710 --> 00:26:03,690 three quotations of the week's news your 582 00:26:06,330 --> 00:26:04,720 job of course identify 583 00:26:08,130 --> 00:26:06,340 I explained just two of them do that 584 00:26:09,600 --> 00:26:08,140 you'll win our prize calls voice on your 585 00:26:12,299 --> 00:26:09,610 home answering machine you ready to go 586 00:26:14,010 --> 00:26:12,309 yeah all right here is your first quote 587 00:26:17,010 --> 00:26:14,020 that's pretty damn cool 588 00:26:19,529 --> 00:26:17,020 that was a theoretical physicist named 589 00:26:21,870 --> 00:26:19,539 Mark chemin outski he's reacting to news 590 00:26:25,289 --> 00:26:21,880 that researchers had found evidence of 591 00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:25,299 what the big bang indeed yes the big 592 00:26:30,659 --> 00:26:28,210 bang or what came right after the Big 593 00:26:32,850 --> 00:26:30,669 Bang basically the beginning of the 594 00:26:34,740 --> 00:26:32,860 universe physicists all over the world 595 00:26:36,149 --> 00:26:34,750 were incredibly excited they said the 596 00:26:38,460 --> 00:26:36,159 discoveries that was announced this week 597 00:26:40,830 --> 00:26:38,470 was the most revolutionary advance in 598 00:26:42,810 --> 00:26:40,840 science and decades it's amazingly cool 599 00:26:46,740 --> 00:26:42,820 it's deeply important it is impossible 600 00:26:48,690 --> 00:26:46,750 to explain in English they tried they 601 00:26:51,090 --> 00:26:48,700 compared the universe to a grapefruit to 602 00:26:53,220 --> 00:26:51,100 a pot of boiling pasta to bread dough 603 00:26:55,789 --> 00:26:53,230 being stretched and then we realized the 604 00:26:58,289 --> 00:26:55,799 physicists had just skipped their lunch 605 00:27:01,169 --> 00:26:58,299 and what happened this week as they 606 00:27:02,970 --> 00:27:01,179 announced an experiment that proved that 607 00:27:04,620 --> 00:27:02,980 they were right they predicted this 608 00:27:06,659 --> 00:27:04,630 result and they got it and they said 609 00:27:09,899 --> 00:27:06,669 this was such an amazing discovery so 610 00:27:12,210 --> 00:27:09,909 specific that one person made an analogy 611 00:27:13,560 --> 00:27:12,220 to imagine if someone were to create a 612 00:27:15,990 --> 00:27:13,570 model of the world in which they 613 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:16,000 predicted that there would be age this 614 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:18,250 is their example a little troll doll 615 00:27:23,850 --> 00:27:20,890 under a floorboard on the third floor of 616 00:27:26,130 --> 00:27:23,860 Ruth Bader Ginsburg childhood home right 617 00:27:27,779 --> 00:27:26,140 now the example and then this week's 618 00:27:29,310 --> 00:27:27,789 discovery was like somebody going to the 619 00:27:30,899 --> 00:27:29,320 home going to the third floor opening up 620 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:30,909 a floorboard and finding it that's how 621 00:27:36,020 --> 00:27:33,410 amazing this prediction was that 622 00:27:40,640 --> 00:27:36,030 so that would be exciting like if I 623 00:27:43,700 --> 00:27:40,650 found it anyway so I am actually gonna 624 00:27:45,290 --> 00:27:43,710 try to explain it to you in English and 625 00:27:47,500 --> 00:27:45,300 Frank you're not the only one to screw 626 00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:47,510 up my last name as you can tell here 627 00:27:55,310 --> 00:27:51,810 that's okay so that was a March 18th 628 00:27:58,850 --> 00:27:55,320 2014 but it's been over half a year 629 00:28:01,550 --> 00:27:58,860 since and since then there have been a 630 00:28:03,350 --> 00:28:01,560 number of questions raised so these are 631 00:28:05,480 --> 00:28:03,360 some of the headlines backlist a Big 632 00:28:07,850 --> 00:28:05,490 Bang discovery gathers steam no evidence 633 00:28:09,950 --> 00:28:07,860 for against gravitational waves they 634 00:28:13,370 --> 00:28:09,960 named discovery comes under fire etc etc 635 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:13,380 so as Carl Sagan said extraordinary 636 00:28:18,590 --> 00:28:15,450 result results require extraordinary 637 00:28:21,140 --> 00:28:18,600 scrutiny and these results if true are 638 00:28:22,940 --> 00:28:21,150 as extraordinary as it gets and they 639 00:28:25,310 --> 00:28:22,950 therefore require the most extraordinary 640 00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:25,320 scrutiny so I'm going to give you an 641 00:28:29,480 --> 00:28:27,810 update to try to tell you what is going 642 00:28:31,850 --> 00:28:29,490 on and what you might want to look 643 00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:31,860 forward for in the future so here's a 644 00:28:36,650 --> 00:28:34,170 brief outline so I'm gonna give you some 645 00:28:38,300 --> 00:28:36,660 background in Cosmo about cosmology I'm 646 00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:38,310 then gonna tell you about an idea that 647 00:28:42,950 --> 00:28:41,010 known as inflation it was postulated by 648 00:28:45,350 --> 00:28:42,960 a variety of theoretical physicists 649 00:28:48,830 --> 00:28:45,360 about 35 years ago and roughly speaking 650 00:28:51,230 --> 00:28:48,840 it's an idea for what set the Big Bang 651 00:28:53,120 --> 00:28:51,240 in motion I'm thinking I'm going to tell 652 00:28:55,310 --> 00:28:53,130 you how it is that we make measurements 653 00:28:57,860 --> 00:28:55,320 of the Cosmic Microwave Background and 654 00:28:59,480 --> 00:28:57,870 how it is that we infer all this 655 00:29:01,610 --> 00:28:59,490 information about the early universe 656 00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:01,620 from the measurements that we make and 657 00:29:19,190 --> 00:29:04,050 then at the end I'll explain what bicep2 658 00:29:29,730 --> 00:29:25,950 okay so I'll explain to you thank you so 659 00:29:31,080 --> 00:29:29,740 I'll explain to you what bicep saw why 660 00:29:32,580 --> 00:29:31,090 we believe they may be seeing 661 00:29:34,920 --> 00:29:32,590 gravitational waves for inflation but 662 00:29:37,260 --> 00:29:34,930 also the possibility that they might be 663 00:29:41,220 --> 00:29:37,270 seeing nothing more than interstellar 664 00:29:43,230 --> 00:29:41,230 dust so there was a NASA satellite that 665 00:29:45,270 --> 00:29:43,240 flew in the early 1990s called 666 00:29:49,130 --> 00:29:45,280 the cosmic background Explorer which we 667 00:29:51,810 --> 00:29:49,140 abbreviate as Kobe and it made a map of 668 00:29:53,580 --> 00:29:51,820 this Cosmic Microwave Background and 669 00:29:55,230 --> 00:29:53,590 that map looked like this and I'll tell 670 00:29:57,299 --> 00:29:55,240 you in a few more slides more precisely 671 00:30:00,660 --> 00:29:57,309 what it is that we're looking for but 672 00:30:02,760 --> 00:30:00,670 very very literally this picture is 673 00:30:06,090 --> 00:30:02,770 actually a picture of the afterglow of 674 00:30:09,960 --> 00:30:06,100 the Big Bang this was a very exciting 675 00:30:11,880 --> 00:30:09,970 science result the two principal 676 00:30:13,620 --> 00:30:11,890 investigators for the project I'm George 677 00:30:15,150 --> 00:30:13,630 Smoot and John Mather who's down the 678 00:30:17,970 --> 00:30:15,160 road to counter Space Flight Center and 679 00:30:20,460 --> 00:30:17,980 who's now the chief scientist for JWST 680 00:30:22,590 --> 00:30:20,470 is that right chief scientist yeah so 681 00:30:25,230 --> 00:30:22,600 they were awarded the 2006 Nobel Prize 682 00:30:30,990 --> 00:30:25,240 so this was a big deal in the world of 683 00:30:33,240 --> 00:30:31,000 cosmology and physics about a decade 684 00:30:34,980 --> 00:30:33,250 later there was another satellite 685 00:30:36,900 --> 00:30:34,990 mission flown by NASA called the 686 00:30:39,330 --> 00:30:36,910 Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe 687 00:30:41,460 --> 00:30:39,340 named after David Wilkinson a physics 688 00:30:43,620 --> 00:30:41,470 professor at Princeton University who 689 00:30:45,270 --> 00:30:43,630 passed away shortly after the launch who 690 00:30:47,010 --> 00:30:45,280 was responsible for doing a lot of the 691 00:30:49,620 --> 00:30:47,020 work that late a lot of the groundwork 692 00:30:53,430 --> 00:30:49,630 for this measurement so this is the map 693 00:30:55,710 --> 00:30:53,440 that the W Maps satellite made about ten 694 00:30:58,320 --> 00:30:55,720 years ago and again this has been 695 00:31:01,200 --> 00:30:58,330 extraordinarily scientifically fruitful 696 00:31:04,200 --> 00:31:01,210 measurement or experiment and I can tell 697 00:31:05,910 --> 00:31:04,210 you that the papers that have come out 698 00:31:08,250 --> 00:31:05,920 of the W Mapp collaboration have been 699 00:31:10,620 --> 00:31:08,260 the most highly cited science paper most 700 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:10,630 highly cited papers in all of science 701 00:31:16,470 --> 00:31:14,010 and inside citations are our currency 702 00:31:18,630 --> 00:31:16,480 papers they get lots of citations by 703 00:31:20,460 --> 00:31:18,640 other scientists are very very valuable 704 00:31:22,440 --> 00:31:20,470 and these papers have received more 705 00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:22,450 citations than any other science project 706 00:31:29,460 --> 00:31:26,410 over the past decade and I should say 707 00:31:30,750 --> 00:31:29,470 that the principal investigator of w map 708 00:31:32,280 --> 00:31:30,760 is actually Chuck Bennett 709 00:31:34,049 --> 00:31:32,290 who's a professor of physics 710 00:31:38,159 --> 00:31:34,059 and astronomy right across the street 711 00:31:40,620 --> 00:31:38,169 here and then more recently launched in 712 00:31:42,630 --> 00:31:40,630 2009 and taking data since then the 713 00:31:44,490 --> 00:31:42,640 European Space Agency has developed a 714 00:31:47,340 --> 00:31:44,500 subsequent generation experiment called 715 00:31:49,860 --> 00:31:47,350 the Planck satellite and this is the 716 00:31:52,080 --> 00:31:49,870 image that was first provided by the 717 00:31:54,419 --> 00:31:52,090 Planck satellite in March of last year 718 00:31:56,940 --> 00:31:54,429 and again this was very exciting science 719 00:31:58,470 --> 00:31:56,950 very science exciting science result it 720 00:32:00,710 --> 00:31:58,480 was announced again on the front page of 721 00:32:03,960 --> 00:32:00,720 the New York Times and other news eight 722 00:32:05,340 --> 00:32:03,970 news sources throughout the world so 723 00:32:07,799 --> 00:32:05,350 this is a picture of the Cosmic 724 00:32:10,950 --> 00:32:07,809 Microwave Background as imaged by Kobe 725 00:32:12,390 --> 00:32:10,960 from the early 1990s this is an image of 726 00:32:16,080 --> 00:32:12,400 the Cosmic Microwave Background is 727 00:32:17,669 --> 00:32:16,090 imaged by W map and this is the image of 728 00:32:19,500 --> 00:32:17,679 the Cosmic Microwave Background provided 729 00:32:21,330 --> 00:32:19,510 by Planck so you see that every 10 years 730 00:32:24,390 --> 00:32:21,340 we've been able to do much better in 731 00:32:27,299 --> 00:32:24,400 terms of angular resolution and angular 732 00:32:30,990 --> 00:32:27,309 resolution is good as you've seen just 733 00:32:33,690 --> 00:32:31,000 with that picture of that's that the 734 00:32:38,220 --> 00:32:33,700 protoplanetary disk it's nice to have 735 00:32:46,590 --> 00:32:38,230 more information so here's a picture 736 00:32:48,840 --> 00:32:46,600 does anybody know what's here close so 737 00:32:51,330 --> 00:32:48,850 actually I gave this talk I think it 738 00:32:53,850 --> 00:32:51,340 might be the projector quality I gave 739 00:32:57,270 --> 00:32:53,860 this talk in Aspen Colorado and 740 00:32:58,620 --> 00:32:57,280 everybody saw what it was I've given the 741 00:33:00,150 --> 00:32:58,630 talk several other times and people 742 00:33:04,710 --> 00:33:00,160 don't know what it is so here's a 743 00:33:06,210 --> 00:33:04,720 high-resolution image okay but still 744 00:33:07,620 --> 00:33:06,220 that's a pretty blurry image you know 745 00:33:09,690 --> 00:33:07,630 what's going on here that's the Mona 746 00:33:13,049 --> 00:33:09,700 Lisa and then here's a much more high 747 00:33:15,510 --> 00:33:13,059 much higher resolution image and this is 748 00:33:18,450 --> 00:33:15,520 a very pretty picture and we can infer a 749 00:33:20,460 --> 00:33:18,460 lot about you know about the picture by 750 00:33:21,810 --> 00:33:20,470 looking at this blurred image we know 751 00:33:22,980 --> 00:33:21,820 that it's the Mona Lisa we know there's 752 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:22,990 a picture of a woman and she's sitting 753 00:33:26,370 --> 00:33:25,330 there and these are her two hands but 754 00:33:28,140 --> 00:33:26,380 this is a much more high-resolution 755 00:33:30,480 --> 00:33:28,150 image and there's a lot more information 756 00:33:32,010 --> 00:33:30,490 in here and if you're an art historian 757 00:33:35,730 --> 00:33:32,020 you would actually go look at the 758 00:33:37,409 --> 00:33:35,740 detailed brushstrokes and infer not only 759 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:37,419 something about the general you know 760 00:33:40,919 --> 00:33:38,770 structure of the painting but you would 761 00:33:42,570 --> 00:33:40,929 actually learn a lot about how da Vinci 762 00:33:44,490 --> 00:33:42,580 actually went about making this painting 763 00:33:45,139 --> 00:33:44,500 so the point is that there's a lot more 764 00:33:47,329 --> 00:33:45,149 information 765 00:33:49,190 --> 00:33:47,339 available when we make high-resolution 766 00:33:51,469 --> 00:33:49,200 images and so now that we have this 767 00:33:52,940 --> 00:33:51,479 Planck satellite image of the Cosmic 768 00:33:57,169 --> 00:33:52,950 Microwave Background we have a huge 769 00:33:57,979 --> 00:33:57,179 amount more information than we did 20 770 00:34:01,070 --> 00:33:57,989 years ago 771 00:34:02,869 --> 00:34:01,080 so what exactly are we looking at so now 772 00:34:04,729 --> 00:34:02,879 I'm going to attempt to explain to you 773 00:34:07,009 --> 00:34:04,739 what it is that this image is showing us 774 00:34:10,220 --> 00:34:07,019 so to do that I'm first going to show 775 00:34:13,339 --> 00:34:10,230 you a picture of the night sky so this 776 00:34:15,470 --> 00:34:13,349 is a picture of the night sky as it 777 00:34:17,659 --> 00:34:15,480 appears when you go outside on a clear 778 00:34:19,549 --> 00:34:17,669 night and look at it and you see lots of 779 00:34:21,680 --> 00:34:19,559 stars and when you look with a very 780 00:34:23,269 --> 00:34:21,690 powerful telescope like the the Hubble 781 00:34:24,980 --> 00:34:23,279 telescope if you see pictures of the 782 00:34:27,980 --> 00:34:24,990 Hubble Deep Field you see lots of 783 00:34:29,750 --> 00:34:27,990 galaxies but the most salient feature of 784 00:34:31,730 --> 00:34:29,760 this is not the stars which are these 785 00:34:36,200 --> 00:34:31,740 tiny little dots but it's actually the 786 00:34:39,289 --> 00:34:36,210 black space in between so most of the 787 00:34:40,940 --> 00:34:39,299 sky is dark when you look at it at 788 00:34:42,680 --> 00:34:40,950 optical frequencies which are the 789 00:34:47,510 --> 00:34:42,690 electromagnetic frequencies at which 790 00:34:51,500 --> 00:34:47,520 your eyes operate but optical lights or 791 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:51,510 visible light is covers only a very very 792 00:34:55,490 --> 00:34:53,010 narrow range of the entire 793 00:34:57,859 --> 00:34:55,500 electromagnetic frequency spectrum so 794 00:34:59,930 --> 00:34:57,869 visible light extends over a very small 795 00:35:01,490 --> 00:34:59,940 range of frequencies or wavelengths and 796 00:35:05,210 --> 00:35:01,500 as we go to the left we're going to 797 00:35:06,950 --> 00:35:05,220 longer wavelengths shorter frequencies 798 00:35:09,950 --> 00:35:06,960 as we go to the right we run to higher 799 00:35:12,410 --> 00:35:09,960 frequencies and shorter wavelengths so 800 00:35:14,089 --> 00:35:12,420 to slightly higher frequencies than 801 00:35:16,160 --> 00:35:14,099 visible light there's ultraviolet light 802 00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:16,170 which you need to worry about when you 803 00:35:21,079 --> 00:35:17,970 go outside when you go out in the beach 804 00:35:22,849 --> 00:35:21,089 there's infrared light at slightly lower 805 00:35:24,650 --> 00:35:22,859 frequencies which is how these are 806 00:35:27,980 --> 00:35:24,660 thermometers the two point that your 807 00:35:29,809 --> 00:35:27,990 forhead work there are microwave 808 00:35:31,519 --> 00:35:29,819 there's microwave radiation and even 809 00:35:34,370 --> 00:35:31,529 longer wavelengths this is how you heat 810 00:35:35,720 --> 00:35:34,380 up your leftover soup and the radio 811 00:35:38,120 --> 00:35:35,730 waves which is how we listen to the 812 00:35:39,769 --> 00:35:38,130 radio or watch TV at higher frequencies 813 00:35:40,940 --> 00:35:39,779 they're x-rays you know what x-rays are 814 00:35:43,039 --> 00:35:40,950 useful for and then even higher 815 00:35:44,210 --> 00:35:43,049 frequencies that are gamma rays so 816 00:35:46,069 --> 00:35:44,220 there's a broad spectrum of 817 00:35:48,470 --> 00:35:46,079 electromagnetic radiation and when we 818 00:35:50,809 --> 00:35:48,480 look at the sky with our eyes we're 819 00:35:53,779 --> 00:35:50,819 seeing only a tiny fraction of what is 820 00:35:56,420 --> 00:35:53,789 actually out there and in particular if 821 00:35:58,820 --> 00:35:56,430 you could look at the sky at microwave 822 00:36:00,890 --> 00:35:58,830 frequencies rather than visit 823 00:36:04,730 --> 00:36:00,900 frequency's the night sky would look 824 00:36:06,800 --> 00:36:04,740 like this this is actually a map of the 825 00:36:09,320 --> 00:36:06,810 sky as it would appear if your eyes are 826 00:36:11,030 --> 00:36:09,330 operated at optical free at microwave 827 00:36:14,750 --> 00:36:11,040 frequencies and it's actually 828 00:36:17,420 --> 00:36:14,760 superimposed on an image of the launch 829 00:36:19,730 --> 00:36:17,430 site for a telescope that was flown in 830 00:36:21,680 --> 00:36:19,740 the late 1990s called boomerang a 831 00:36:23,690 --> 00:36:21,690 balloon borne telescope that flew around 832 00:36:25,010 --> 00:36:23,700 Antarctica so this is actually a 833 00:36:26,780 --> 00:36:25,020 mountain in the background this is 834 00:36:28,700 --> 00:36:26,790 actually a cloud and this is what the 835 00:36:30,770 --> 00:36:28,710 night sky would look like if your eyes 836 00:36:33,140 --> 00:36:30,780 operate on microwave frequencies so at 837 00:36:37,730 --> 00:36:33,150 microwave frequencies the night sky is 838 00:36:40,190 --> 00:36:37,740 not dark it blows this was anticipated 839 00:36:47,240 --> 00:36:40,200 not only by theoretical physicists but 840 00:36:50,150 --> 00:36:47,250 also by hand go and this is a picture of 841 00:36:52,220 --> 00:36:50,160 a small fraction of the sky this is 842 00:36:55,370 --> 00:36:52,230 actually a current state-of-the-art 843 00:36:58,910 --> 00:36:55,380 image of the microwave sky so this is 844 00:37:01,580 --> 00:36:58,920 actually a map of the entire sky in all 845 00:37:04,790 --> 00:37:01,590 directions and it is called a mala wide 846 00:37:06,830 --> 00:37:04,800 or equal area projection so if we took a 847 00:37:09,080 --> 00:37:06,840 map of the earth the earth is has a 848 00:37:11,420 --> 00:37:09,090 spherical surface if we were to sort of 849 00:37:12,680 --> 00:37:11,430 unwrap it and plot it in this way then 850 00:37:14,870 --> 00:37:12,690 you would see North America over here 851 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:14,880 South America over here Eurasia Africa 852 00:37:19,250 --> 00:37:16,650 Antarctica at the bottom and Australia 853 00:37:21,470 --> 00:37:19,260 over here so what we look at over here 854 00:37:24,860 --> 00:37:21,480 is an image actually of the entire 855 00:37:26,900 --> 00:37:24,870 surface of the sky unwrapped so that we 856 00:37:30,080 --> 00:37:26,910 can plot it on the Sun in this form over 857 00:37:34,400 --> 00:37:30,090 here and what you're seeing with these 858 00:37:37,940 --> 00:37:34,410 color contrasts what you're seeing with 859 00:37:40,430 --> 00:37:37,950 these color contrasts are regions of hot 860 00:37:42,650 --> 00:37:40,440 or brighter or fainter regions regions 861 00:37:45,380 --> 00:37:42,660 that are brighter or fainter but only by 862 00:37:47,570 --> 00:37:45,390 roughly one part in hundred thousand so 863 00:37:50,300 --> 00:37:47,580 to a first approximation this glow is 864 00:37:51,830 --> 00:37:50,310 very very uniform but if your eyes 865 00:37:54,380 --> 00:37:51,840 operated not only at microwave 866 00:37:55,970 --> 00:37:54,390 frequencies but could detect brightness 867 00:37:57,620 --> 00:37:55,980 fluctuations of one part one hundred 868 00:37:59,510 --> 00:37:57,630 thousand you would see that there are 869 00:38:00,890 --> 00:37:59,520 some colder regions and some hotter 870 00:38:05,180 --> 00:38:00,900 regions that's what these red and blue 871 00:38:07,910 --> 00:38:05,190 spots are so let me tell you a little 872 00:38:10,340 --> 00:38:07,920 bit about cosmology so cosmology is the 873 00:38:11,670 --> 00:38:10,350 study of the origin and evolution of the 874 00:38:13,770 --> 00:38:11,680 universe 875 00:38:15,270 --> 00:38:13,780 the first step in this direction is to 876 00:38:17,160 --> 00:38:15,280 actually understand something that's a 877 00:38:18,870 --> 00:38:17,170 bit smaller and closer to home the solar 878 00:38:20,520 --> 00:38:18,880 system and so we just heard a bunch of 879 00:38:22,290 --> 00:38:20,530 very interesting things that are going 880 00:38:27,420 --> 00:38:22,300 on in our exploration of the solar 881 00:38:32,280 --> 00:38:27,430 system we are one of eight or nine 882 00:38:36,030 --> 00:38:32,290 planets I don't know what the number of 883 00:38:39,120 --> 00:38:36,040 planets this week is but all of the 884 00:38:40,980 --> 00:38:39,130 planets orbit around the Sun and the 885 00:38:42,630 --> 00:38:40,990 reason they orbit around the Sun is that 886 00:38:44,070 --> 00:38:42,640 the Sun exerts a very strong 887 00:38:46,440 --> 00:38:44,080 gravitational has a very strong 888 00:38:50,010 --> 00:38:46,450 gravitational field that keeps all these 889 00:38:52,620 --> 00:38:50,020 planets in orbit around the Sun it turns 890 00:38:55,350 --> 00:38:52,630 out that our Sun is a star that's very 891 00:38:57,120 --> 00:38:55,360 special to us because it is our star but 892 00:38:59,550 --> 00:38:57,130 in the bigger picture there's nothing 893 00:39:02,790 --> 00:38:59,560 special about the Sun it turns out that 894 00:39:05,420 --> 00:39:02,800 it is one of roughly 10 billion such 895 00:39:08,070 --> 00:39:05,430 stars all of which are gravitationally 896 00:39:10,560 --> 00:39:08,080 agglomerate it into this huge structure 897 00:39:13,500 --> 00:39:10,570 that we call a galaxy in the name of our 898 00:39:16,410 --> 00:39:13,510 particular galaxy is the Milky Way so 899 00:39:18,870 --> 00:39:16,420 the Milky Way is a very massive object 900 00:39:20,730 --> 00:39:18,880 and it exerts a gravitational field and 901 00:39:23,190 --> 00:39:20,740 that gravitational key field keeps the 902 00:39:25,500 --> 00:39:23,200 orbit of each of these stars in a rough 903 00:39:27,660 --> 00:39:25,510 keeps each of these stars on a roughly 904 00:39:30,540 --> 00:39:27,670 circular orbit around the center of the 905 00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:30,550 galaxy and it takes our Sun about 200 906 00:39:36,300 --> 00:39:31,810 million years to get all the way around 907 00:39:39,090 --> 00:39:36,310 once so it turns out though that this 908 00:39:41,640 --> 00:39:39,100 Milky Way is a very special galaxy to us 909 00:39:43,080 --> 00:39:41,650 because it is our galaxy but again in 910 00:39:45,780 --> 00:39:43,090 the bigger picture there is nothing 911 00:39:48,570 --> 00:39:45,790 special about this galaxy it turns out 912 00:39:51,990 --> 00:39:48,580 that it is one of several hundred 913 00:39:55,110 --> 00:39:52,000 billion galaxies that we can see in our 914 00:39:57,090 --> 00:39:55,120 observable universe so this is not a 915 00:40:01,350 --> 00:39:57,100 picture of the universe this is actually 916 00:40:05,130 --> 00:40:01,360 a simulation a cosmological simulation 917 00:40:08,850 --> 00:40:05,140 actually Frank was one of the pioneers 918 00:40:11,730 --> 00:40:08,860 of simulations like this so each of 919 00:40:13,950 --> 00:40:11,740 these little dots here is a galaxy and 920 00:40:15,270 --> 00:40:13,960 this is a picture of a huge volume in 921 00:40:17,940 --> 00:40:15,280 the universe that shows how these 922 00:40:18,570 --> 00:40:17,950 galaxies are distributed throughout the 923 00:40:21,510 --> 00:40:18,580 universe 924 00:40:23,230 --> 00:40:21,520 so the earth spins around the Sun the 925 00:40:25,150 --> 00:40:23,240 Sun spins around the Milky Way 926 00:40:26,890 --> 00:40:25,160 and then you might imagine that all 927 00:40:29,260 --> 00:40:26,900 these galaxies wind up spinning around 928 00:40:31,589 --> 00:40:29,270 each other it turns out though that at 929 00:40:34,750 --> 00:40:31,599 this stage the hierarchy ends as 930 00:40:37,510 --> 00:40:34,760 discovered originally by this pipe 931 00:40:40,210 --> 00:40:37,520 smoking gentleman by the name of Edwin 932 00:40:43,000 --> 00:40:40,220 Hubble so Edwin Hubble was an astronomer 933 00:40:49,079 --> 00:40:43,010 at Carnegie observatories in Pasadena 934 00:40:51,190 --> 00:40:49,089 and he made a measurement that 935 00:40:56,589 --> 00:40:51,200 revolutionized our understanding of the 936 00:40:58,990 --> 00:40:56,599 universe so those of you who are fans of 937 00:41:01,210 --> 00:40:59,000 Isaac Asimov might be interested to pick 938 00:41:03,430 --> 00:41:01,220 up a big fat book he wrote called 939 00:41:05,589 --> 00:41:03,440 chronology of the history of science and 940 00:41:07,599 --> 00:41:05,599 it's a great book and it starts from 941 00:41:10,450 --> 00:41:07,609 ancient times and it goes through every 942 00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:10,460 year and lists the most exciting science 943 00:41:16,359 --> 00:41:12,890 discoveries of that year a collection of 944 00:41:18,700 --> 00:41:16,369 years and he has a very broad an 945 00:41:21,910 --> 00:41:18,710 interesting and unique perspective on 946 00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:21,920 all of science and in that book he calls 947 00:41:27,880 --> 00:41:24,650 this discovery along with the discovery 948 00:41:31,089 --> 00:41:27,890 of the double helix structure of the DNA 949 00:41:33,040 --> 00:41:31,099 molecule as the two most revolutionary 950 00:41:35,890 --> 00:41:33,050 and scientific advances of the 20th 951 00:41:39,940 --> 00:41:35,900 century so what Hubble did is he looked 952 00:41:41,890 --> 00:41:39,950 at a bunch of nearby galaxies and he 953 00:41:44,770 --> 00:41:41,900 measured or estimated the distance to 954 00:41:47,079 --> 00:41:44,780 each galaxy and then he also measured he 955 00:41:49,329 --> 00:41:47,089 also saw that every galaxy was moving 956 00:41:51,760 --> 00:41:49,339 away from us and he measured the 957 00:41:53,740 --> 00:41:51,770 velocity with which each galaxy was 958 00:41:55,839 --> 00:41:53,750 moving away from us and what he showed 959 00:41:57,880 --> 00:41:55,849 is that there's a correlation more 960 00:42:00,220 --> 00:41:57,890 distant galaxies are moving away from us 961 00:42:02,560 --> 00:42:00,230 at larger speeds than closer galaxies 962 00:42:04,660 --> 00:42:02,570 the galaxies that are fairly nearby are 963 00:42:06,579 --> 00:42:04,670 moving away from us but not so rapidly 964 00:42:09,390 --> 00:42:06,589 the ones that are more that are further 965 00:42:12,190 --> 00:42:09,400 away are moving away much faster and 966 00:42:16,930 --> 00:42:12,200 from this we infer that the universe is 967 00:42:18,670 --> 00:42:16,940 expanding and I made a movie you have to 968 00:42:21,190 --> 00:42:18,680 understand I'm a theoretical physicist 969 00:42:23,800 --> 00:42:21,200 this is very very high technology for me 970 00:42:26,680 --> 00:42:23,810 so I'm gonna show you a movie of an 971 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:26,690 expanding universe so I want you to look 972 00:42:31,839 --> 00:42:29,810 at these two this pair of galaxies so 973 00:42:33,849 --> 00:42:31,849 there's this of each of these red lines 974 00:42:36,700 --> 00:42:33,859 supposed to be a galaxy or point into a 975 00:42:39,339 --> 00:42:36,710 galaxy I want you to look at this pair 976 00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:39,349 in this pair so the red pair are closer 977 00:42:44,500 --> 00:42:42,170 together and the blue pair are further 978 00:42:47,829 --> 00:42:44,510 away and now what I'm going to do is 979 00:42:49,630 --> 00:42:47,839 blow up the entire grid and as I blow up 980 00:42:51,760 --> 00:42:49,640 the entire grid which you're supposed to 981 00:42:54,730 --> 00:42:51,770 notice is that the blue points are 982 00:42:56,620 --> 00:42:54,740 moving away faster from moving away from 983 00:43:02,859 --> 00:42:56,630 each other faster than are the red 984 00:43:10,720 --> 00:43:02,869 points so let me play the movie so there 985 00:43:12,190 --> 00:43:10,730 it is you don't get that so the red 986 00:43:14,740 --> 00:43:12,200 points are moving away from each other 987 00:43:17,760 --> 00:43:14,750 whoops slightly larger it's slightly 988 00:43:22,870 --> 00:43:17,770 smaller velocities than the blue points 989 00:43:27,099 --> 00:43:22,880 so Edwin Hubble's discovery demonstrated 990 00:43:29,230 --> 00:43:27,109 that the universe is expanding if the 991 00:43:30,730 --> 00:43:29,240 universe is expanding today if all the 992 00:43:33,880 --> 00:43:30,740 galaxies are moving away from each other 993 00:43:35,559 --> 00:43:33,890 today that means that earlier times if 994 00:43:37,690 --> 00:43:35,569 we run this movie backwards at earlier 995 00:43:39,460 --> 00:43:37,700 times every galaxy would be closer 996 00:43:41,410 --> 00:43:39,470 together all of the galaxies would be 997 00:43:44,020 --> 00:43:41,420 much closer together the density of 998 00:43:46,240 --> 00:43:44,030 galaxies would be larger so the density 999 00:43:48,849 --> 00:43:46,250 of the universe the number of galaxies 1000 00:43:52,120 --> 00:43:48,859 per some unit volume would have been 1001 00:43:54,520 --> 00:43:52,130 larger so if this is what the universe 1002 00:43:59,020 --> 00:43:54,530 looks like today each of these dots 1003 00:44:00,309 --> 00:43:59,030 being a galaxy then at earlier times the 1004 00:44:01,569 --> 00:44:00,319 density would have been higher the 1005 00:44:04,150 --> 00:44:01,579 galaxies would have been closer together 1006 00:44:05,140 --> 00:44:04,160 and at earlier times the galaxies were 1007 00:44:10,059 --> 00:44:05,150 even closer together 1008 00:44:12,640 --> 00:44:10,069 etc etc etc so one thing that we can do 1009 00:44:16,450 --> 00:44:12,650 from Hubble's measurement is extrapolate 1010 00:44:19,000 --> 00:44:16,460 back in time if we see any two galaxies 1011 00:44:21,400 --> 00:44:19,010 moving away from each other today if we 1012 00:44:24,130 --> 00:44:21,410 run that movie back in time we can 1013 00:44:25,990 --> 00:44:24,140 figure out that at some finite time in 1014 00:44:28,960 --> 00:44:26,000 the past those galaxies must have been 1015 00:44:31,569 --> 00:44:28,970 on top of each other okay if I see a car 1016 00:44:33,910 --> 00:44:31,579 a mile away and I see that it's driving 1017 00:44:36,160 --> 00:44:33,920 away at 60 miles per hour I know that 1018 00:44:38,920 --> 00:44:36,170 one minute ago it was right here 1019 00:44:40,990 --> 00:44:38,930 so we do the same calculation with the 1020 00:44:45,069 --> 00:44:41,000 expansion rate that Hubble measured and 1021 00:44:47,430 --> 00:44:45,079 we infer that 13.8 billion years ago the 1022 00:44:49,990 --> 00:44:47,440 universe must have been in a state of 1023 00:44:53,380 --> 00:44:50,000 infinite density 1024 00:44:55,720 --> 00:44:53,390 and that is what we refer to as the Big 1025 00:45:03,099 --> 00:44:55,730 Bang so this is my picture of the 1026 00:45:04,450 --> 00:45:03,109 infinite density so I told someone today 1027 00:45:05,800 --> 00:45:04,460 I'm giving a public lecture this evening 1028 00:45:09,240 --> 00:45:05,810 they said you got to show them nice 1029 00:45:12,700 --> 00:45:09,250 pictures they love to see nice pictures 1030 00:45:16,510 --> 00:45:12,710 so here's a slightly nicer picture so 1031 00:45:18,280 --> 00:45:16,520 this is a picture that illustrates the 1032 00:45:21,339 --> 00:45:18,290 evolution of the universe as we 1033 00:45:24,099 --> 00:45:21,349 understand it now and it's made by the W 1034 00:45:25,750 --> 00:45:24,109 map collaboration so we live in the 1035 00:45:29,589 --> 00:45:25,760 universe that's thirteen point seven 1036 00:45:31,330 --> 00:45:29,599 seven billion years old and we observe 1037 00:45:33,940 --> 00:45:31,340 it with satellites like the W map 1038 00:45:35,830 --> 00:45:33,950 satellite and if we look back in time so 1039 00:45:38,589 --> 00:45:35,840 as we go from the right to the left 1040 00:45:41,380 --> 00:45:38,599 we're looking further further larger and 1041 00:45:44,290 --> 00:45:41,390 larger distances since light travels at 1042 00:45:45,670 --> 00:45:44,300 a finite speed when we look at larger 1043 00:45:47,920 --> 00:45:45,680 and larger distances we are seeing 1044 00:45:50,530 --> 00:45:47,930 objects as they were at earlier in 1045 00:45:52,630 --> 00:45:50,540 earlier times so when we look at fairly 1046 00:45:54,579 --> 00:45:52,640 nearby objects things like galaxies we 1047 00:45:57,280 --> 00:45:54,589 are seeing those galaxies as they were 1048 00:45:58,900 --> 00:45:57,290 fairly recently as we go to larger 1049 00:46:00,910 --> 00:45:58,910 distances for example with the Hubble 1050 00:46:02,589 --> 00:46:00,920 Space Telescope we can see galaxies that 1051 00:46:04,900 --> 00:46:02,599 are about ten billion years old ten 1052 00:46:08,620 --> 00:46:04,910 billion light years away we're seeing 1053 00:46:09,820 --> 00:46:08,630 things that are 10 billion years away 10 1054 00:46:11,370 --> 00:46:09,830 billion light years away we're seeing 1055 00:46:14,829 --> 00:46:11,380 them as they were a few billion years 1056 00:46:16,420 --> 00:46:14,839 after the Big Bang but even with our 1057 00:46:18,310 --> 00:46:16,430 most powerful telescopes there's only a 1058 00:46:20,859 --> 00:46:18,320 finite distance out to which we can see 1059 00:46:22,930 --> 00:46:20,869 with the James Webb Space Telescope we 1060 00:46:25,000 --> 00:46:22,940 actually hope to image directly the 1061 00:46:27,190 --> 00:46:25,010 first stars which we have very good 1062 00:46:29,800 --> 00:46:27,200 reason to believe were formed about 400 1063 00:46:32,020 --> 00:46:29,810 million years after the Big Bang but if 1064 00:46:32,980 --> 00:46:32,030 we look even further back which we can 1065 00:46:35,109 --> 00:46:32,990 do with these Cosmic Microwave 1066 00:46:36,160 --> 00:46:35,119 Background measurements when we make 1067 00:46:37,990 --> 00:46:36,170 these Cosmic Microwave Background 1068 00:46:41,200 --> 00:46:38,000 measurements were actually looking at 1069 00:46:43,000 --> 00:46:41,210 the universe as it was three hundred and 1070 00:46:45,790 --> 00:46:43,010 seventy five thousand years after the 1071 00:46:49,450 --> 00:46:45,800 Big Bang and we are looking back a 1072 00:46:52,300 --> 00:46:49,460 distance of about 13.8 eight billion 1073 00:46:53,589 --> 00:46:52,310 light-years now the thing that's so 1074 00:46:56,440 --> 00:46:53,599 exciting about these Cosmic Microwave 1075 00:46:58,390 --> 00:46:56,450 Background measurements is not only that 1076 00:46:59,920 --> 00:46:58,400 we're imaging the universe as it was 1077 00:47:02,050 --> 00:46:59,930 three hundred seventy-five thousand 1078 00:47:03,610 --> 00:47:02,060 years after the Big Bang but we have 1079 00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:03,620 very good reason to believe 1080 00:47:08,770 --> 00:47:05,450 as I will try to explain in the next few 1081 00:47:11,650 --> 00:47:08,780 slides that this image that we have 1082 00:47:14,410 --> 00:47:11,660 reflects directly what was happening in 1083 00:47:15,850 --> 00:47:14,420 the very first trillionth of a 1084 00:47:17,500 --> 00:47:15,860 trillionth of a trillionth of a second 1085 00:47:20,590 --> 00:47:17,510 after the Big Bang at the time that this 1086 00:47:21,880 --> 00:47:20,600 process which we hypothesize this 1087 00:47:25,050 --> 00:47:21,890 process called inflation that we 1088 00:47:28,960 --> 00:47:25,060 hypothesize should have been occurring 1089 00:47:30,370 --> 00:47:28,970 so one way of looking at how remarkable 1090 00:47:32,230 --> 00:47:30,380 this is is that when we look at this 1091 00:47:35,200 --> 00:47:32,240 Cosmic Microwave Background image of the 1092 00:47:37,900 --> 00:47:35,210 Big Bang the universe was 380,000 years 1093 00:47:41,580 --> 00:47:37,910 old it's now 13.8 billion years old if 1094 00:47:44,440 --> 00:47:41,590 you look at a human who is 50 years old 1095 00:47:47,380 --> 00:47:44,450 and you try to figure out what fraction 1096 00:47:50,710 --> 00:47:47,390 of the age must have been would they 1097 00:47:53,440 --> 00:47:50,720 have been when they were 375 thousand 1098 00:47:57,070 --> 00:47:53,450 years divided by 13.8 billion years this 1099 00:47:59,230 --> 00:47:57,080 is analogous to taking a picture of a 1100 00:48:03,850 --> 00:47:59,240 human being a few seconds after 1101 00:48:05,530 --> 00:48:03,860 conception and from this image we can 1102 00:48:08,920 --> 00:48:05,540 infer the initial conditions that gave 1103 00:48:10,300 --> 00:48:08,930 rise to everything else later on so 1104 00:48:12,730 --> 00:48:10,310 here's another picture of what we're 1105 00:48:16,450 --> 00:48:12,740 looking at so this is where we live in 1106 00:48:18,790 --> 00:48:16,460 the universe the universe is 13.8 1107 00:48:20,710 --> 00:48:18,800 billion years old nothing can travel 1108 00:48:22,570 --> 00:48:20,720 faster than the speed of light which 1109 00:48:24,940 --> 00:48:22,580 means that there is a finite distance 1110 00:48:27,550 --> 00:48:24,950 out to which we see which we call the 1111 00:48:29,830 --> 00:48:27,560 horizon and that distance is 13.8 1112 00:48:32,560 --> 00:48:29,840 billion light years and so when we look 1113 00:48:34,870 --> 00:48:32,570 at the universe with whatever telescopes 1114 00:48:36,670 --> 00:48:34,880 or whatever observations we can make we 1115 00:48:38,440 --> 00:48:36,680 can only look out to this finite 1116 00:48:42,130 --> 00:48:38,450 distance and the Cosmic Microwave 1117 00:48:44,260 --> 00:48:42,140 Background is actually this surface over 1118 00:48:46,060 --> 00:48:44,270 here so when we look at the Cosmic 1119 00:48:46,540 --> 00:48:46,070 Microwave Background that W map or 1120 00:48:48,910 --> 00:48:46,550 Planck 1121 00:48:51,970 --> 00:48:48,920 image is actually a picture of the 1122 00:48:55,690 --> 00:48:51,980 universe picture of a spherical surface 1123 00:48:57,460 --> 00:48:55,700 in the universe of radius 13.8 billion 1124 00:49:00,520 --> 00:48:57,470 light years and we're seeing it as it 1125 00:49:03,550 --> 00:49:00,530 was 380,000 years after the Big Bang so 1126 00:49:05,470 --> 00:49:03,560 it's actually a remarkable image we're 1127 00:49:07,570 --> 00:49:05,480 actually looking at the edge of the 1128 00:49:11,500 --> 00:49:07,580 observable universe and we are imaging 1129 00:49:13,480 --> 00:49:11,510 it with an amazing precision and 1130 00:49:15,400 --> 00:49:13,490 resolution so that's what we're looking 1131 00:49:17,110 --> 00:49:15,410 at we're looking at the edge of the 1132 00:49:19,430 --> 00:49:17,120 observable universe 1133 00:49:22,490 --> 00:49:19,440 so what I'm going to try to tell you now 1134 00:49:24,500 --> 00:49:22,500 is that this picture is not only you 1135 00:49:26,660 --> 00:49:24,510 know amazing because it's the edge of 1136 00:49:28,460 --> 00:49:26,670 the observable universe but it's amazing 1137 00:49:31,670 --> 00:49:28,470 because it provides a huge amount of 1138 00:49:34,010 --> 00:49:31,680 detailed and precise information about 1139 00:49:38,660 --> 00:49:34,020 the origin of the universe its contents 1140 00:49:40,460 --> 00:49:38,670 and its evolution so what I'm going to 1141 00:49:43,760 --> 00:49:40,470 tell you about in particular is that 1142 00:49:45,620 --> 00:49:43,770 this picture gives us very good reason 1143 00:49:48,290 --> 00:49:45,630 to believe that this mechanism that we 1144 00:49:50,180 --> 00:49:48,300 call inflation actually occurred that it 1145 00:49:53,260 --> 00:49:50,190 actually is what set the Big Bang in 1146 00:49:55,670 --> 00:49:53,270 motion so as I said inflation is an idea 1147 00:49:58,010 --> 00:49:55,680 more or less for what to set the Big 1148 00:49:59,840 --> 00:49:58,020 Bang in motion what is it that actually 1149 00:50:01,550 --> 00:49:59,850 made the thing bang in the first place 1150 00:50:02,690 --> 00:50:01,560 it's something that would have happened 1151 00:50:04,100 --> 00:50:02,700 during the first trillionth of a 1152 00:50:06,200 --> 00:50:04,110 trillionth of a trillionth of a second 1153 00:50:07,760 --> 00:50:06,210 of the universe and one of the things 1154 00:50:09,650 --> 00:50:07,770 that's most exciting not only to 1155 00:50:13,610 --> 00:50:09,660 cosmologists and astronomers but to 1156 00:50:16,490 --> 00:50:13,620 physicists is that the mechanism behind 1157 00:50:18,470 --> 00:50:16,500 inflation is actually based on ideas 1158 00:50:20,990 --> 00:50:18,480 that come from elementary particle 1159 00:50:23,030 --> 00:50:21,000 theory so this is a talk about cosmology 1160 00:50:24,680 --> 00:50:23,040 it's at the Space Telescope Science 1161 00:50:26,060 --> 00:50:24,690 Institute we're talking about the 1162 00:50:29,480 --> 00:50:26,070 biggest things in the universe that we 1163 00:50:31,040 --> 00:50:29,490 see very very far away but it turns out 1164 00:50:35,270 --> 00:50:31,050 that this is actually also talked about 1165 00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:35,280 elementary particle theory so we have a 1166 00:50:42,680 --> 00:50:39,810 beautiful theory for the physics of 1167 00:50:46,880 --> 00:50:42,690 sumit subatomic particles we now know 1168 00:50:48,710 --> 00:50:46,890 that atomic nuclei are made out of 1169 00:50:53,630 --> 00:50:48,720 protons and neutrons we've known this 1170 00:50:55,520 --> 00:50:53,640 for 80-plus years we know more moreover 1171 00:50:57,500 --> 00:50:55,530 that those protons neutrons are made out 1172 00:50:59,900 --> 00:50:57,510 of smaller particles that we call up and 1173 00:51:01,880 --> 00:50:59,910 down quarks we also know that those up 1174 00:51:04,370 --> 00:51:01,890 and down quarks are two of the lightest 1175 00:51:07,750 --> 00:51:04,380 of six quarks the other four of the 1176 00:51:11,600 --> 00:51:07,760 charm strange top and bottom all of the 1177 00:51:14,210 --> 00:51:11,610 chemistry that's responsible for just 1178 00:51:16,970 --> 00:51:14,220 about everything involved in life and 1179 00:51:18,860 --> 00:51:16,980 plan to earth all the chemistry is due 1180 00:51:22,220 --> 00:51:18,870 to the behavior of the electrons in 1181 00:51:24,260 --> 00:51:22,230 atoms that spin around the nuclei it 1182 00:51:27,710 --> 00:51:24,270 turns out that the electron is again 1183 00:51:29,390 --> 00:51:27,720 only one of three similar particles that 1184 00:51:30,620 --> 00:51:29,400 we call leptons it's the lightest and 1185 00:51:33,259 --> 00:51:30,630 there are two other particles 1186 00:51:34,729 --> 00:51:33,269 lepton in the tile left on and then it 1187 00:51:37,849 --> 00:51:34,739 associated with each of these three 1188 00:51:39,499 --> 00:51:37,859 leptons are three very weakly 1189 00:51:42,739 --> 00:51:39,509 interacting and very light particles 1190 00:51:44,210 --> 00:51:42,749 called neutrinos and we have a theory 1191 00:51:45,979 --> 00:51:44,220 that explains how these particles 1192 00:51:48,140 --> 00:51:45,989 interact these particles interact 1193 00:51:50,509 --> 00:51:48,150 through the exchange of photons which is 1194 00:51:52,400 --> 00:51:50,519 light but there are also other particles 1195 00:51:55,789 --> 00:51:52,410 analogous to the photon called gluons 1196 00:51:57,769 --> 00:51:55,799 and Z and W bosons that also describe 1197 00:51:59,599 --> 00:51:57,779 the behavior of these particles and the 1198 00:52:03,469 --> 00:51:59,609 last piece of this puzzle was discovered 1199 00:52:05,719 --> 00:52:03,479 just two years ago at the Large Hadron 1200 00:52:08,180 --> 00:52:05,729 Collider the Higgs boson and there was a 1201 00:52:09,890 --> 00:52:08,190 nobel prize awarded last year to Higgs 1202 00:52:11,569 --> 00:52:09,900 and two other gentlemen who first 1203 00:52:18,529 --> 00:52:11,579 predicted the existence of this particle 1204 00:52:19,910 --> 00:52:18,539 back in the 1960s so I am going to try 1205 00:52:21,319 --> 00:52:19,920 to explain to you why it is that we 1206 00:52:24,319 --> 00:52:21,329 believe that something like inflation 1207 00:52:26,690 --> 00:52:24,329 occurred so why do we believe that 1208 00:52:29,960 --> 00:52:26,700 something like inflation occur at the 1209 00:52:36,039 --> 00:52:29,970 birth of the universe it's because this 1210 00:52:43,339 --> 00:52:39,680 inflation there's no I there's no end 1211 00:52:45,680 --> 00:52:43,349 there's no F no other letters at some 1212 00:52:49,279 --> 00:52:45,690 point some people thought they saw an SH 1213 00:52:52,249 --> 00:52:49,289 which stands for Stephen Hawking I can't 1214 00:52:55,069 --> 00:52:52,259 see it in here right now but that has 1215 00:52:58,069 --> 00:52:55,079 been debunked by the W math 1216 00:52:59,870 --> 00:52:58,079 collaboration but still what I'm going 1217 00:53:02,029 --> 00:52:59,880 to try to explain is that there is a 1218 00:53:06,349 --> 00:53:02,039 huge amount of information in this map 1219 00:53:07,729 --> 00:53:06,359 and it is does all but say inflation so 1220 00:53:12,499 --> 00:53:07,739 to explain how this works 1221 00:53:16,910 --> 00:53:12,509 I took a piece of paper and I drew 100 1222 00:53:23,029 --> 00:53:16,920 dots on there so there are 150 dots 50 1223 00:53:25,219 --> 00:53:23,039 dots and I put them at random so you can 1224 00:53:30,170 --> 00:53:25,229 look at this and you are not supposed to 1225 00:53:32,779 --> 00:53:30,180 see any pattern okay I just 50 dots down 1226 00:53:39,200 --> 00:53:32,789 if you see a pattern in there it's 1227 00:53:46,680 --> 00:53:43,460 exactly so so fifty dots at random so 1228 00:53:50,190 --> 00:53:46,690 here is another picture another piece of 1229 00:53:52,890 --> 00:53:50,200 paper I put fifty down for fifty fifty 1230 00:53:56,670 --> 00:53:52,900 dots on this piece of paper but there is 1231 00:53:58,680 --> 00:53:56,680 some structure and your eye and your 1232 00:54:00,239 --> 00:53:58,690 brain your brain can process the image 1233 00:54:03,979 --> 00:54:00,249 that your eye makes and you can figure 1234 00:54:07,650 --> 00:54:03,989 it out so you all see that there are now 1235 00:54:11,190 --> 00:54:07,660 ten I'm sorry five agglomerations each 1236 00:54:12,930 --> 00:54:11,200 that has ten dots okay so your brain 1237 00:54:15,529 --> 00:54:12,940 does this calculation your brain can 1238 00:54:18,930 --> 00:54:15,539 process this and see structure in there 1239 00:54:20,609 --> 00:54:18,940 here's another picture so now there's an 1240 00:54:22,769 --> 00:54:20,619 additional layer of structure there 1241 00:54:26,130 --> 00:54:22,779 again five agglomerations of ten dots 1242 00:54:29,630 --> 00:54:26,140 but each of these glom racing's is no 1243 00:54:33,950 --> 00:54:29,640 longer just random dots thrown out 1244 00:54:37,279 --> 00:54:33,960 they're actually more or less circles 1245 00:54:39,390 --> 00:54:37,289 here's another layer of structure 1246 00:54:43,880 --> 00:54:39,400 everyone can see what's different 1247 00:54:49,170 --> 00:54:43,890 between these two the other circles 1248 00:54:51,809 --> 00:54:49,180 these are squares so your brain is doing 1249 00:54:53,940 --> 00:54:51,819 an image processing algorithm you don't 1250 00:54:57,210 --> 00:54:53,950 think about it but your brain is an 1251 00:54:59,460 --> 00:54:57,220 extremely powerful computer and then 1252 00:55:01,799 --> 00:54:59,470 here's another you know image another 1253 00:55:03,089 --> 00:55:01,809 another pattern so again this is 1254 00:55:05,489 --> 00:55:03,099 different and you can see there are 1255 00:55:07,259 --> 00:55:05,499 fifty dots they're not randomly thrown 1256 00:55:12,150 --> 00:55:07,269 out on the piece of paper but they're 1257 00:55:17,009 --> 00:55:12,160 actually arranged in a lattice so there 1258 00:55:20,489 --> 00:55:17,019 is information that can be distinguished 1259 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:20,499 from seemingly random patterns and your 1260 00:55:25,460 --> 00:55:23,170 brain knows how to do that not only your 1261 00:55:28,710 --> 00:55:25,470 brain knows how to do this but your 1262 00:55:33,900 --> 00:55:28,720 computer also knows how to do this so 1263 00:55:36,210 --> 00:55:33,910 any of you have an apple and you zom use 1264 00:55:39,289 --> 00:55:36,220 a I fo toe there's this new feature that 1265 00:55:41,579 --> 00:55:39,299 came out a few years called um faces and 1266 00:55:43,979 --> 00:55:41,589 the computer will actually go through 1267 00:55:47,819 --> 00:55:43,989 all of your pictures and guess with 1268 00:55:49,130 --> 00:55:47,829 pretty good accuracy who the people in 1269 00:55:53,850 --> 00:55:49,140 those pictures are 1270 00:55:56,370 --> 00:55:53,860 okay so computer scientists have 1271 00:55:58,020 --> 00:55:56,380 actually developed in recent years very 1272 00:56:01,130 --> 00:55:58,030 powerful algorithms for facial 1273 00:56:04,020 --> 00:56:01,140 recognition software fascial recognition 1274 00:56:05,670 --> 00:56:04,030 so again the computer can now do 1275 00:56:08,940 --> 00:56:05,680 something like what you do you know you 1276 00:56:10,590 --> 00:56:08,950 look at two people no two people look 1277 00:56:12,660 --> 00:56:10,600 alike you can always tell any two people 1278 00:56:13,980 --> 00:56:12,670 apart then the computer we've now been 1279 00:56:18,830 --> 00:56:13,990 able to train the computer to do the 1280 00:56:23,490 --> 00:56:18,840 same thing so this looks like gibberish 1281 00:56:28,950 --> 00:56:23,500 if you don't know how to look at it this 1282 00:56:32,070 --> 00:56:28,960 is another some more gibberish so can 1283 00:56:38,490 --> 00:56:32,080 anybody read this this actually says 1284 00:56:40,770 --> 00:56:38,500 something so interestingly enough I gave 1285 00:56:42,540 --> 00:56:40,780 a talk to high school physics teachers 1286 00:56:44,970 --> 00:56:42,550 from the area over the summer and 1287 00:56:48,450 --> 00:56:44,980 several of them actually were able to 1288 00:56:50,820 --> 00:56:48,460 read this so this is the simplest 1289 00:56:54,140 --> 00:56:50,830 possible code this is I think called the 1290 00:56:57,060 --> 00:56:54,150 one letter swap so if I take this 1291 00:56:58,530 --> 00:56:57,070 sentence and I replace every letter by 1292 00:57:00,660 --> 00:56:58,540 the preceding letter in the alphabet 1293 00:57:05,490 --> 00:57:00,670 sort of replace every B by an a every C 1294 00:57:06,990 --> 00:57:05,500 by a B every D by a C then this winds up 1295 00:57:08,820 --> 00:57:07,000 saying the true sign of intelligence is 1296 00:57:11,610 --> 00:57:08,830 not knowledge but imagination which is 1297 00:57:16,050 --> 00:57:11,620 something Albert Einstein said so the 1298 00:57:18,810 --> 00:57:16,060 point is that what you see and what 1299 00:57:20,340 --> 00:57:18,820 initially appears as gibberish can 1300 00:57:23,610 --> 00:57:20,350 actually have meaning if you know how to 1301 00:57:26,700 --> 00:57:23,620 crack the code and this is actually what 1302 00:57:29,670 --> 00:57:26,710 we do in science the point of science is 1303 00:57:30,480 --> 00:57:29,680 to find hidden patterns in nature here's 1304 00:57:32,490 --> 00:57:30,490 another example 1305 00:57:34,890 --> 00:57:32,500 not from code breaking but from science 1306 00:57:39,690 --> 00:57:34,900 and paleontology you find a bunch of 1307 00:57:41,460 --> 00:57:39,700 rocks or fossils and then if you know 1308 00:57:42,990 --> 00:57:41,470 what you're doing you can assemble them 1309 00:57:45,660 --> 00:57:43,000 it's a puzzle you put it together and 1310 00:57:50,580 --> 00:57:45,670 this bunch of random rocks actually 1311 00:57:53,070 --> 00:57:50,590 turns out to be a dinosaur so this is 1312 00:57:54,750 --> 00:57:53,080 not gibberish and the way that we 1313 00:57:59,820 --> 00:57:54,760 actually crack the code the way we 1314 00:58:02,070 --> 00:57:59,830 actually interpret this image is to 1315 00:58:03,930 --> 00:58:02,080 employ mathematical technique 1316 00:58:07,010 --> 00:58:03,940 that were developed by joseph fourier in 1317 00:58:10,230 --> 00:58:07,020 the early 1800s and what Fourier showed 1318 00:58:13,070 --> 00:58:10,240 mathematically is that any pattern can 1319 00:58:15,270 --> 00:58:13,080 be represented as a bunch of waves 1320 00:58:17,760 --> 00:58:15,280 anything can be represented as a bunch 1321 00:58:20,010 --> 00:58:17,770 of waves those of you read about on the 1322 00:58:22,620 --> 00:58:20,020 the particle wave duality in quantum 1323 00:58:24,780 --> 00:58:22,630 mechanics the particle wave duality is 1324 00:58:27,330 --> 00:58:24,790 nothing more than the observation that 1325 00:58:29,340 --> 00:58:27,340 Fourier made in the early 1800s that 1326 00:58:32,100 --> 00:58:29,350 anything can be represented as a bunch 1327 00:58:34,860 --> 00:58:32,110 of waves this laser pointer can be 1328 00:58:37,140 --> 00:58:34,870 represented as a bunch of waves and when 1329 00:58:39,720 --> 00:58:37,150 you learn about Fourier analysis in 1330 00:58:41,940 --> 00:58:39,730 mathematics classes it's very very 1331 00:58:44,370 --> 00:58:41,950 straightforward so it turns out that you 1332 00:58:47,100 --> 00:58:44,380 can just apply what we call a Fourier 1333 00:58:49,590 --> 00:58:47,110 transform or a wave transform to this 1334 00:58:51,570 --> 00:58:49,600 map and when you apply a wave transform 1335 00:58:58,230 --> 00:58:51,580 to this map it winds up looking like 1336 00:59:00,780 --> 00:58:58,240 this and this has structure that you can 1337 00:59:02,820 --> 00:59:00,790 see and to the trained eye it's not just 1338 00:59:04,110 --> 00:59:02,830 structure but it's actually beautiful 1339 00:59:07,950 --> 00:59:04,120 and has a huge amount of information 1340 00:59:12,570 --> 00:59:07,960 this which is mathematically equivalent 1341 00:59:15,840 --> 00:59:12,580 to this this is the fingerprint of 1342 00:59:17,520 --> 00:59:15,850 inflation so turns out that what's 1343 00:59:19,170 --> 00:59:17,530 particularly interesting is not just 1344 00:59:21,270 --> 00:59:19,180 that we can make the image so seeing 1345 00:59:22,590 --> 00:59:21,280 this image tells us that something like 1346 00:59:25,200 --> 00:59:22,600 inflation must have occurred in the 1347 00:59:28,050 --> 00:59:25,210 early universe but moreover there's a 1348 00:59:29,610 --> 00:59:28,060 lot of information so there's the radii 1349 00:59:31,140 --> 00:59:29,620 of the wings there's the width of the 1350 00:59:33,540 --> 00:59:31,150 Rings for example that there's the 1351 00:59:35,730 --> 00:59:33,550 brightness of the Rings so this ring 1352 00:59:37,170 --> 00:59:35,740 this dots is a lot brighter than this 1353 00:59:38,790 --> 00:59:37,180 ring here this ring is brighter than 1354 00:59:41,490 --> 00:59:38,800 this one over here there are also these 1355 00:59:43,290 --> 00:59:41,500 troughs they're dark but not necessarily 1356 00:59:44,940 --> 00:59:43,300 completely dark and then there's the 1357 00:59:47,550 --> 00:59:44,950 width of the Rings how wide is this how 1358 00:59:49,740 --> 00:59:47,560 wide is this one etc etc so there's a 1359 00:59:51,360 --> 00:59:49,750 lot of information in here there are a 1360 00:59:55,740 --> 00:59:51,370 lot of numbers that I would need to 1361 00:59:58,830 --> 00:59:55,750 fully describe this pattern and if we 1362 01:00:00,840 --> 00:59:58,840 process this information a bit further 1363 01:00:03,660 --> 01:00:00,850 what we infer from this processing is 1364 01:00:05,190 --> 01:00:03,670 that the atoms of which we are composed 1365 01:00:07,860 --> 01:00:05,200 of which everything in the solar system 1366 01:00:11,300 --> 01:00:07,870 is composed constitute only 4.6 percent 1367 01:00:13,530 --> 01:00:11,310 of the energy density of the universe 1368 01:00:15,360 --> 01:00:13,540 there is something called dark matter 1369 01:00:15,839 --> 01:00:15,370 which holds galaxies together which 1370 01:00:18,329 --> 01:00:15,849 makes up 1371 01:00:20,700 --> 01:00:18,339 23% of the universe and then there's 1372 01:00:22,109 --> 01:00:20,710 dark energy which makes up the other 72% 1373 01:00:25,440 --> 01:00:22,119 of the universe and this was discovered 1374 01:00:27,120 --> 01:00:25,450 in 1998 and Nobel Prize was given to 1375 01:00:28,950 --> 01:00:27,130 three gentlemen including Adam riess 1376 01:00:33,420 --> 01:00:28,960 across the street for this discovery 1377 01:00:36,210 --> 01:00:33,430 back in 2011 the other thing that's this 1378 01:00:37,680 --> 01:00:36,220 image tells us as I told you is that 1379 01:00:39,870 --> 01:00:37,690 something like inflation must have 1380 01:00:42,690 --> 01:00:39,880 occurred so we live in you universe 1381 01:00:44,849 --> 01:00:42,700 that's 13.8 billion years old the first 1382 01:00:46,650 --> 01:00:44,859 stars were formed to 400 million years 1383 01:00:48,120 --> 01:00:46,660 after the Big Bang we have this very 1384 01:00:49,559 --> 01:00:48,130 nice image of the universe as it was 1385 01:00:49,999 --> 01:00:49,569 three hundred thousand years after the 1386 01:00:52,829 --> 01:00:50,009 Big Bang 1387 01:00:55,380 --> 01:00:52,839 but that processing of that image that 1388 01:00:56,789 --> 01:00:55,390 wave transform that fingerprint tells us 1389 01:00:58,890 --> 01:00:56,799 that something like inflation occurred 1390 01:01:01,339 --> 01:00:58,900 in the first fraction of a fraction of a 1391 01:01:05,900 --> 01:01:01,349 fraction of a second after the Big Bang 1392 01:01:08,640 --> 01:01:05,910 so we can feel very proud of ourselves 1393 01:01:10,319 --> 01:01:08,650 because now we have a very elegant model 1394 01:01:14,519 --> 01:01:10,329 for what happened what's that the Big 1395 01:01:16,589 --> 01:01:14,529 Bang in motion but that's never enough 1396 01:01:19,049 --> 01:01:16,599 for scientists and we all want to know 1397 01:01:20,670 --> 01:01:19,059 what else can we learn can we 1398 01:01:24,569 --> 01:01:20,680 characterize this period of inflation 1399 01:01:26,640 --> 01:01:24,579 any better and the answer is yes so it 1400 01:01:28,200 --> 01:01:26,650 turns out that inflation makes a number 1401 01:01:29,849 --> 01:01:28,210 of predictions some of which were 1402 01:01:31,579 --> 01:01:29,859 verified with this fingerprint that we 1403 01:01:34,049 --> 01:01:31,589 saw in the Cosmic Microwave Background 1404 01:01:37,140 --> 01:01:34,059 but inflation also predicts that the 1405 01:01:41,849 --> 01:01:37,150 universe should be filled with a gas of 1406 01:01:44,009 --> 01:01:41,859 gravitational waves so electromagnetic 1407 01:01:45,959 --> 01:01:44,019 waves are light and the way 1408 01:01:47,910 --> 01:01:45,969 electromagnetic waves work is as follows 1409 01:01:50,640 --> 01:01:47,920 so think about a radio transmitter and a 1410 01:01:52,170 --> 01:01:50,650 radio receiver there is an antenna at 1411 01:01:54,269 --> 01:01:52,180 the Trant for the transmitter you can 1412 01:01:57,359 --> 01:01:54,279 see those antenna towers on antenna Hill 1413 01:02:01,140 --> 01:01:57,369 across the highway so those antennas 1414 01:02:03,359 --> 01:02:01,150 have metal and what happens is they set 1415 01:02:05,940 --> 01:02:03,369 up electronics so that the electrons in 1416 01:02:08,249 --> 01:02:05,950 that metal shake up and down those 1417 01:02:09,959 --> 01:02:08,259 electrons have an electric field and 1418 01:02:13,019 --> 01:02:09,969 when those electrons wiggle up and down 1419 01:02:14,849 --> 01:02:13,029 they send out a propagating disturbance 1420 01:02:17,549 --> 01:02:14,859 in the electromagnetic fields and that 1421 01:02:19,440 --> 01:02:17,559 wave travels to the antenna in your car 1422 01:02:21,749 --> 01:02:19,450 and the antenna of your car has a bunch 1423 01:02:23,519 --> 01:02:21,759 of free electrons and what happens is 1424 01:02:25,589 --> 01:02:23,529 this wave comes along it hits these 1425 01:02:27,630 --> 01:02:25,599 electrons and it sets those electrons in 1426 01:02:29,190 --> 01:02:27,640 motion and then your radio processes 1427 01:02:34,140 --> 01:02:29,200 that signal and play 1428 01:02:37,589 --> 01:02:34,150 top 40 hits or whatever else so that's 1429 01:02:40,410 --> 01:02:37,599 how electromagnetic waves work if I set 1430 01:02:42,510 --> 01:02:40,420 electric charges in motion it sends out 1431 01:02:44,250 --> 01:02:42,520 waves and then those waves set other 1432 01:02:47,310 --> 01:02:44,260 electric charges in motion and that's 1433 01:02:50,910 --> 01:02:47,320 how we use these for communication it 1434 01:02:53,400 --> 01:02:50,920 turns out that in gravity there is 1435 01:02:55,079 --> 01:02:53,410 something similar if I take a massive 1436 01:02:57,030 --> 01:02:55,089 object that has a gravitational field 1437 01:03:00,089 --> 01:02:57,040 like the Sun has a gravitational field 1438 01:03:01,920 --> 01:03:00,099 if I were to say shake the Sun up and 1439 01:03:03,329 --> 01:03:01,930 down that would give rise to a 1440 01:03:05,520 --> 01:03:03,339 propagating disturbance in the 1441 01:03:07,680 --> 01:03:05,530 gravitational field and then if there 1442 01:03:10,200 --> 01:03:07,690 was some other test mass like a planet 1443 01:03:14,849 --> 01:03:10,210 far away that planet would get set in 1444 01:03:16,970 --> 01:03:14,859 motion so this is a picture of what 1445 01:03:20,370 --> 01:03:16,980 would happen if a gravitational wave 1446 01:03:22,230 --> 01:03:20,380 hits a spherical object what a 1447 01:03:24,750 --> 01:03:22,240 gravitational wave actually does is not 1448 01:03:26,430 --> 01:03:24,760 shake the object up and down as it does 1449 01:03:29,370 --> 01:03:26,440 with an electron but it actually gives 1450 01:03:31,859 --> 01:03:29,380 rise to distortions in the shape of this 1451 01:03:33,870 --> 01:03:31,869 spherical object that elongates it in 1452 01:03:35,220 --> 01:03:33,880 this direction and then elongates in 1453 01:03:37,530 --> 01:03:35,230 this direction in this direction this 1454 01:03:40,020 --> 01:03:37,540 direction etc so it would take an object 1455 01:03:42,839 --> 01:03:40,030 and sort of make it wobble around that 1456 01:03:44,190 --> 01:03:42,849 shape wobble around so inflation 1457 01:03:45,930 --> 01:03:44,200 predicts that the universe would be 1458 01:03:48,180 --> 01:03:45,940 filled with these gravitational waves 1459 01:03:53,490 --> 01:03:48,190 and in particular those gravitational 1460 01:03:57,420 --> 01:03:53,500 waves would hits the Cosmic Microwave 1461 01:03:58,890 --> 01:03:57,430 Background surface of last scattering at 1462 01:04:00,540 --> 01:03:58,900 the Cosmic Microwave Background we're 1463 01:04:02,160 --> 01:04:00,550 looking at a spherical surface at the 1464 01:04:05,430 --> 01:04:02,170 edge of the universe at the edge of the 1465 01:04:06,930 --> 01:04:05,440 observable universe in the absence of a 1466 01:04:08,640 --> 01:04:06,940 gravitational wave that surface is 1467 01:04:10,950 --> 01:04:08,650 perfectly spherical but if these 1468 01:04:13,500 --> 01:04:10,960 inflationary gravitational waves exist 1469 01:04:15,630 --> 01:04:13,510 they would distort the shape of that 1470 01:04:20,220 --> 01:04:15,640 surface of last scattering some 1471 01:04:26,370 --> 01:04:20,230 particular way so what my colleagues and 1472 01:04:29,910 --> 01:04:26,380 I and another group realized in 1996 is 1473 01:04:32,609 --> 01:04:29,920 that the gravitational waves produced by 1474 01:04:34,559 --> 01:04:32,619 inflation give rise to a signature in 1475 01:04:38,160 --> 01:04:34,569 the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave 1476 01:04:40,050 --> 01:04:38,170 Background so it turns out that light 1477 01:04:43,340 --> 01:04:40,060 has properties that are apparent to all 1478 01:04:45,599 --> 01:04:43,350 of us light can be brighter or faint 1479 01:04:47,640 --> 01:04:45,609 some things are very bright and some 1480 01:04:51,870 --> 01:04:47,650 things are very faint light also has 1481 01:04:53,430 --> 01:04:51,880 color it can be red green blue etc it 1482 01:04:55,260 --> 01:04:53,440 turns out that there's another property 1483 01:04:58,500 --> 01:04:55,270 the light has that we generally that our 1484 01:05:01,590 --> 01:04:58,510 eyes are not really tuned to detect and 1485 01:05:04,140 --> 01:05:01,600 that is polarization so remember an 1486 01:05:05,940 --> 01:05:04,150 electromagnetic wave is a wave so if I 1487 01:05:07,530 --> 01:05:05,950 shake an electron up and down the 1488 01:05:10,260 --> 01:05:07,540 electromagnetic wave is gonna go like 1489 01:05:11,460 --> 01:05:10,270 this run into you and if you have an 1490 01:05:13,200 --> 01:05:11,470 antenna that's pointed in this direction 1491 01:05:15,420 --> 01:05:13,210 then the electrons will shake up and 1492 01:05:17,310 --> 01:05:15,430 down but if I have an intent of its 1493 01:05:18,750 --> 01:05:17,320 point in this direction the electrons 1494 01:05:21,840 --> 01:05:18,760 can't shake up and down there's nowhere 1495 01:05:24,120 --> 01:05:21,850 for them to go so if I have an antenna 1496 01:05:25,410 --> 01:05:24,130 that's oriented this way I can tell 1497 01:05:27,540 --> 01:05:25,420 whether the doctor magnetic wave is 1498 01:05:29,220 --> 01:05:27,550 coming this way and if I have an antenna 1499 01:05:30,690 --> 01:05:29,230 oriented this way I can detect 1500 01:05:33,000 --> 01:05:30,700 electromagnetic waves where they are 1501 01:05:35,849 --> 01:05:33,010 shaking is in the horizontal direction 1502 01:05:38,010 --> 01:05:35,859 and you can actually detect this if you 1503 01:05:40,710 --> 01:05:38,020 have polarized sunglasses next time you 1504 01:05:43,349 --> 01:05:40,720 go to the ATM machine most ATM machines 1505 01:05:45,300 --> 01:05:43,359 are LCD screens most out most LCD 1506 01:05:47,490 --> 01:05:45,310 screens are polarized if you take your 1507 01:05:51,090 --> 01:05:47,500 polarized sunglasses and rotate them by 1508 01:05:53,430 --> 01:05:51,100 45 degrees the screen will disappear so 1509 01:05:56,310 --> 01:05:53,440 light is polarized and you can measure 1510 01:05:57,510 --> 01:05:56,320 it it's easy to detect polarization so 1511 01:06:00,620 --> 01:05:57,520 here's actually a picture of what I told 1512 01:06:05,220 --> 01:06:00,630 you before electromagnetic waves are 1513 01:06:07,380 --> 01:06:05,230 oops electromagnetic waves are what we 1514 01:06:10,320 --> 01:06:07,390 call transverse waves they shake up and 1515 01:06:12,750 --> 01:06:10,330 down or side to side and this isn't 1516 01:06:15,720 --> 01:06:12,760 distinction two longitudinal waves like 1517 01:06:17,790 --> 01:06:15,730 sound waves so when I talk there's a 1518 01:06:20,990 --> 01:06:17,800 sound wave that propagates it actually 1519 01:06:22,980 --> 01:06:21,000 has a wave that profited compresses 1520 01:06:26,430 --> 01:06:22,990 along the direction of which it's 1521 01:06:28,140 --> 01:06:26,440 propagating anyway electromagnetic waves 1522 01:06:30,030 --> 01:06:28,150 are transverse waves and so they can 1523 01:06:33,960 --> 01:06:30,040 have this linear polarization that's 1524 01:06:35,790 --> 01:06:33,970 either up and down or side to side so 1525 01:06:37,290 --> 01:06:35,800 now suppose I look at an image there's a 1526 01:06:39,120 --> 01:06:37,300 polarization over here there's a 1527 01:06:40,500 --> 01:06:39,130 polarization over here polarization over 1528 01:06:45,170 --> 01:06:40,510 here there could be a polarization and 1529 01:06:48,090 --> 01:06:45,180 every point so here is an image a 1530 01:06:50,160 --> 01:06:48,100 polarized pattern that I can draw on the 1531 01:06:51,840 --> 01:06:50,170 surface of the board and here's another 1532 01:06:53,940 --> 01:06:51,850 polarization pattern in the neck and 1533 01:06:55,440 --> 01:06:53,950 draw and here's another polarization 1534 01:06:56,069 --> 01:06:55,450 pattern here's another polarization 1535 01:06:58,169 --> 01:06:56,079 pattern 1536 01:06:59,819 --> 01:06:58,179 the difference between the ones on the 1537 01:07:01,859 --> 01:06:59,829 left and the ones on the right is that 1538 01:07:04,169 --> 01:07:01,869 the ones on the right have a handedness 1539 01:07:06,269 --> 01:07:04,179 this one swirls around in a 1540 01:07:08,429 --> 01:07:06,279 counterclockwise direction and this 1541 01:07:10,140 --> 01:07:08,439 rolls around in a clockwise direction if 1542 01:07:12,929 --> 01:07:10,150 I look at this in a mirror it would look 1543 01:07:15,120 --> 01:07:12,939 like this and vice versa if I were to 1544 01:07:16,709 --> 01:07:15,130 look at this in a mirror would look the 1545 01:07:19,229 --> 01:07:16,719 same if I look at this in the mirror it 1546 01:07:22,079 --> 01:07:19,239 would look the same so these we call in 1547 01:07:24,660 --> 01:07:22,089 technical jargon emotes in these we call 1548 01:07:27,150 --> 01:07:24,670 in technical jargon be modes so the B 1549 01:07:29,969 --> 01:07:27,160 modes have the swirling pattern and what 1550 01:07:32,609 --> 01:07:29,979 we realized back in 1996 is that 1551 01:07:35,059 --> 01:07:32,619 gravitational waves give rise to the 1552 01:07:38,239 --> 01:07:35,069 swirling pattern in the CMB polarization 1553 01:07:42,959 --> 01:07:38,249 so this is something that we pointed out 1554 01:07:44,759 --> 01:07:42,969 in 1996 and various other theoretical 1555 01:07:47,729 --> 01:07:44,769 physicists studied it and found it 1556 01:07:48,809 --> 01:07:47,739 interesting and experimental physicists 1557 01:07:50,969 --> 01:07:48,819 also thought that it might be 1558 01:07:53,339 --> 01:07:50,979 interesting to try to measure look for a 1559 01:07:55,979 --> 01:07:53,349 swirling pattern in the polarization of 1560 01:07:58,160 --> 01:07:55,989 the Cosmic Microwave Background so since 1561 01:08:00,299 --> 01:07:58,170 then there have been a huge number of 1562 01:08:03,449 --> 01:08:00,309 independent experimental groups that 1563 01:08:05,219 --> 01:08:03,459 have been looking for this so this ABS 1564 01:08:07,049 --> 01:08:05,229 stands for a B mode search this is a 1565 01:08:08,849 --> 01:08:07,059 Princeton led collaboration light bird 1566 01:08:09,689 --> 01:08:08,859 is a Japanese project that's on the 1567 01:08:11,880 --> 01:08:09,699 drawing board 1568 01:08:13,799 --> 01:08:11,890 he Beck's was a University of Minnesota 1569 01:08:17,189 --> 01:08:13,809 LEDs balloon experiment that flew 1570 01:08:21,030 --> 01:08:17,199 recently the atacama cosmology telescope 1571 01:08:24,269 --> 01:08:21,040 is a Princeton led collaboration at in 1572 01:08:26,549 --> 01:08:24,279 Chile the Polar Bear Simon's array is I 1573 01:08:27,839 --> 01:08:26,559 believe also in actually I don't know 1574 01:08:33,569 --> 01:08:27,849 where it is I forget I think it's also 1575 01:08:36,089 --> 01:08:33,579 in Chile this is a UCSD UC Berkeley LED 1576 01:08:37,319 --> 01:08:36,099 collaboration the Planck satellite was 1577 01:08:40,379 --> 01:08:37,329 not designed to make these measurements 1578 01:08:43,140 --> 01:08:40,389 but they did a last-minute change to the 1579 01:08:45,289 --> 01:08:43,150 design to measure polarization Pipers in 1580 01:08:48,599 --> 01:08:45,299 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center effort 1581 01:08:51,260 --> 01:08:48,609 LSP is a Rome a project of an Italian 1582 01:08:53,939 --> 01:08:51,270 project spider is a project led by 1583 01:08:56,459 --> 01:08:53,949 Princeton University SP T poses huge 1584 01:08:58,229 --> 01:08:56,469 collaboration led by University of 1585 01:08:59,849 --> 01:08:58,239 Chicago and then there's also a project 1586 01:09:01,649 --> 01:08:59,859 right across the street called the class 1587 01:09:02,220 --> 01:09:01,659 telescope led by Chuck Bennett so V 1588 01:09:05,189 --> 01:09:02,230 marriage 1589 01:09:07,319 --> 01:09:05,199 um that's also looking for the signal so 1590 01:09:09,329 --> 01:09:07,329 this is a big deal and a lot of 1591 01:09:09,870 --> 01:09:09,339 experimental groups have been racing to 1592 01:09:11,610 --> 01:09:09,880 detect 1593 01:09:14,790 --> 01:09:11,620 the swirling pattern and the CMB 1594 01:09:17,160 --> 01:09:14,800 polarization so that's why there was a 1595 01:09:19,880 --> 01:09:17,170 lot of attention given to this 1596 01:09:24,330 --> 01:09:19,890 announcement on the 17th of March 2014 1597 01:09:26,160 --> 01:09:24,340 of detection of the swirling pattern so 1598 01:09:27,690 --> 01:09:26,170 this is actually the map of the Cosmic 1599 01:09:29,340 --> 01:09:27,700 Microwave Background polarization that 1600 01:09:31,560 --> 01:09:29,350 this collaboration made that the sky 1601 01:09:33,360 --> 01:09:31,570 telescope made and you can see the 1602 01:09:35,550 --> 01:09:33,370 swirling pattern so around this red spot 1603 01:09:38,130 --> 01:09:35,560 the polarization swirling in this 1604 01:09:40,170 --> 01:09:38,140 direction and around this blue spot over 1605 01:09:44,970 --> 01:09:40,180 here it's sort of swirling in the other 1606 01:09:47,070 --> 01:09:44,980 direction so this if it is what they 1607 01:09:50,540 --> 01:09:47,080 believe it they if it's what they claim 1608 01:09:54,660 --> 01:09:50,550 it is what they think it is is amazing 1609 01:09:57,930 --> 01:09:54,670 so the question now is whether they are 1610 01:10:00,420 --> 01:09:57,940 really seeing a V mode signal from 1611 01:10:02,970 --> 01:10:00,430 gravitational waves from inflation or 1612 01:10:06,240 --> 01:10:02,980 possibly just some contamination from 1613 01:10:07,980 --> 01:10:06,250 dust in the Milky Way so when we look at 1614 01:10:10,710 --> 01:10:07,990 this Cosmic Microwave Background we have 1615 01:10:13,050 --> 01:10:10,720 to look through our own galaxy and it 1616 01:10:15,510 --> 01:10:13,060 turns out that our own galaxy has a lot 1617 01:10:18,600 --> 01:10:15,520 of interstellar dust and this 1618 01:10:21,630 --> 01:10:18,610 interstellar dust can emit light that 1619 01:10:24,330 --> 01:10:21,640 can be polarized and so we're not really 1620 01:10:27,270 --> 01:10:24,340 sure whether what they're seeing is 1621 01:10:29,820 --> 01:10:27,280 gravitational waves or dust so back in 1622 01:10:32,610 --> 01:10:29,830 march bicep2 actually provided several 1623 01:10:34,110 --> 01:10:32,620 fairly persuasive arguments that their 1624 01:10:37,470 --> 01:10:34,120 data does not look like what we would 1625 01:10:38,970 --> 01:10:37,480 expect dust to look like but other 1626 01:10:40,320 --> 01:10:38,980 people since then have said well we 1627 01:10:41,970 --> 01:10:40,330 don't really know what the slips like 1628 01:10:43,910 --> 01:10:41,980 interstellar dust is very complicated 1629 01:10:46,830 --> 01:10:43,920 anybody's trying to sweep up a floor 1630 01:10:50,880 --> 01:10:46,840 knows that dust can be very very 1631 01:10:52,920 --> 01:10:50,890 complicated and more recently back in 1632 01:10:57,840 --> 01:10:52,930 September the Planck satellite released 1633 01:10:59,850 --> 01:10:57,850 new data on dust that actually seems to 1634 01:11:02,010 --> 01:10:59,860 indicate the dust does not look like 1635 01:11:05,640 --> 01:11:02,020 what bicep2 thought it should look like 1636 01:11:08,400 --> 01:11:05,650 back in March so we don't really know 1637 01:11:09,780 --> 01:11:08,410 now whether that signal that b-mode 1638 01:11:12,810 --> 01:11:09,790 signals that they detected is 1639 01:11:14,820 --> 01:11:12,820 gravitational waves or dust so what 1640 01:11:16,410 --> 01:11:14,830 we're trying to do now is figure it out 1641 01:11:18,030 --> 01:11:16,420 and one way that we're hoping to figure 1642 01:11:21,210 --> 01:11:18,040 it out is through this frequency 1643 01:11:23,040 --> 01:11:21,220 dependence so I told you that light has 1644 01:11:23,630 --> 01:11:23,050 a electromagnetic frequency less 1645 01:11:25,790 --> 01:11:23,640 terminated 1646 01:11:28,760 --> 01:11:25,800 sequence II and there are broad range of 1647 01:11:30,680 --> 01:11:28,770 electromagnetic frequencies it turns out 1648 01:11:33,470 --> 01:11:30,690 that the B mode signal that they are 1649 01:11:36,530 --> 01:11:33,480 looking for would be very large at 1650 01:11:38,090 --> 01:11:36,540 roughly 150 gigahertz the 1651 01:11:40,280 --> 01:11:38,100 electromagnetic frequency at which the 1652 01:11:41,960 --> 01:11:40,290 bicep2 measurements are made but smaller 1653 01:11:44,930 --> 01:11:41,970 at higher frequencies and smaller at 1654 01:11:47,900 --> 01:11:44,940 lower frequencies dust on the other hand 1655 01:11:50,870 --> 01:11:47,910 would be much larger at higher 1656 01:11:53,510 --> 01:11:50,880 frequencies than at lower frequencies so 1657 01:11:55,310 --> 01:11:53,520 what bicep did in order to try to 1658 01:11:57,740 --> 01:11:55,320 distinguish whether they were looking at 1659 01:12:00,890 --> 01:11:57,750 the Cosmic Microwave Background or dust 1660 01:12:03,800 --> 01:12:00,900 was used data from 150 gigahertz and 1661 01:12:07,240 --> 01:12:03,810 weaker data less lower signal-to-noise 1662 01:12:10,520 --> 01:12:07,250 data from 100 gigahertz complemented by 1663 01:12:12,380 --> 01:12:10,530 not very precise information from W map 1664 01:12:14,210 --> 01:12:12,390 at low frequencies and not very precise 1665 01:12:20,180 --> 01:12:14,220 information from Planck at higher 1666 01:12:21,920 --> 01:12:20,190 frequencies so the idea that they the 1667 01:12:24,140 --> 01:12:21,930 algorithms they used were good 1668 01:12:28,220 --> 01:12:24,150 algorithms but the data available were 1669 01:12:29,900 --> 01:12:28,230 not very very good so what my colleagues 1670 01:12:31,430 --> 01:12:29,910 across the street Chuck Bennett and Toby 1671 01:12:33,800 --> 01:12:31,440 marrieds are trying to do with this some 1672 01:12:36,320 --> 01:12:33,810 class telescope cosmology large angular 1673 01:12:37,880 --> 01:12:36,330 scale surveyor is to try to do this 1674 01:12:40,370 --> 01:12:37,890 multi frequency measurement more 1675 01:12:43,100 --> 01:12:40,380 precisely so here's another picture of 1676 01:12:45,830 --> 01:12:43,110 this that I along lines I showed you so 1677 01:12:47,930 --> 01:12:45,840 the signal strength for the for a 1678 01:12:49,430 --> 01:12:47,940 gravitational waves from the Cosman the 1679 01:12:51,950 --> 01:12:49,440 Cosmic Microwave Background looks like 1680 01:12:55,340 --> 01:12:51,960 this whereas the signal from the galaxy 1681 01:12:58,130 --> 01:12:55,350 goes down and then back up and they 1682 01:13:00,950 --> 01:12:58,140 actually have hope to image the sky in 1683 01:13:02,900 --> 01:13:00,960 four frequencies 40 90 150 and 200 20 1684 01:13:05,330 --> 01:13:02,910 gigahertz and if they can measure the 1685 01:13:07,250 --> 01:13:05,340 relative strength of the signals in 1686 01:13:09,050 --> 01:13:07,260 these four different frequencies they 1687 01:13:11,360 --> 01:13:09,060 can distinguish the contribution from 1688 01:13:13,940 --> 01:13:11,370 the Milky Way from the cosmic signal 1689 01:13:16,730 --> 01:13:13,950 that we're really interested in the 1690 01:13:20,150 --> 01:13:16,740 other thing that we hope to do is try to 1691 01:13:21,730 --> 01:13:20,160 use a spatial the spatial dependence of 1692 01:13:25,400 --> 01:13:21,740 the signal roughly a cross correlation 1693 01:13:28,100 --> 01:13:25,410 so Planck provides a map of the dust it 1694 01:13:29,840 --> 01:13:28,110 tells us where the dust is and then we 1695 01:13:31,340 --> 01:13:29,850 can look at the bicep2 signal and see 1696 01:13:31,730 --> 01:13:31,350 whether there be mode amplitude is 1697 01:13:34,580 --> 01:13:31,740 bigger 1698 01:13:36,569 --> 01:13:34,590 we're playing causes of dust is and it 1699 01:13:39,479 --> 01:13:36,579 is very very literally like trying to 1700 01:13:42,540 --> 01:13:39,489 fingerprints so we have a fingerprint of 1701 01:13:44,040 --> 01:13:42,550 dust from Planck and this is what bicep2 1702 01:13:45,959 --> 01:13:44,050 might look like and they want to know 1703 01:13:49,919 --> 01:13:45,969 whether this fingerprint looks the same 1704 01:13:52,770 --> 01:13:49,929 as this fingerprint so the question is 1705 01:13:54,209 --> 01:13:52,780 when we actually image the dust map 1706 01:13:58,260 --> 01:13:54,219 which is being provided by the Planck 1707 01:14:01,950 --> 01:13:58,270 satellite will it look more like this or 1708 01:14:04,379 --> 01:14:01,960 like this and the answer is we don't 1709 01:14:07,589 --> 01:14:04,389 know the measurements have not been made 1710 01:14:09,720 --> 01:14:07,599 yet with a sufficient precision but we 1711 01:14:12,750 --> 01:14:09,730 hope that they will in the next few 1712 01:14:14,640 --> 01:14:12,760 years so the next steps are to overlay 1713 01:14:16,470 --> 01:14:14,650 the Planck and the bicep2 maps to see 1714 01:14:17,939 --> 01:14:16,480 whether they look the same or not if 1715 01:14:19,740 --> 01:14:17,949 they look completely different that 1716 01:14:22,350 --> 01:14:19,750 provides some reasonable evidence that 1717 01:14:23,910 --> 01:14:22,360 bicep2 is seen gravitational waves if 1718 01:14:27,600 --> 01:14:23,920 they look the same then Planck the 1719 01:14:29,459 --> 01:14:27,610 bicep2 is probably just seeing dust in 1720 01:14:31,620 --> 01:14:29,469 science things are not true because 1721 01:14:33,240 --> 01:14:31,630 somebody or some collaboration says 1722 01:14:35,689 --> 01:14:33,250 they're true they're true because many 1723 01:14:37,799 --> 01:14:35,699 different scientists make independent 1724 01:14:39,629 --> 01:14:37,809 observations and come to the same 1725 01:14:43,080 --> 01:14:39,639 conclusions and so there are all these 1726 01:14:45,209 --> 01:14:43,090 other competing telescopes which are you 1727 01:14:47,280 --> 01:14:45,219 know catching up to bicep2 in terms of 1728 01:14:48,870 --> 01:14:47,290 sensitivity and if bicep2 is seen 1729 01:14:50,669 --> 01:14:48,880 gravitational waves these other guys 1730 01:14:52,229 --> 01:14:50,679 should be seeing them too there's the 1731 01:14:54,660 --> 01:14:52,239 frequency dependence that I talked 1732 01:14:56,729 --> 01:14:54,670 talked about and then if there is a 1733 01:14:58,260 --> 01:14:56,739 gravitational wave signal it should be 1734 01:15:00,359 --> 01:14:58,270 the same all over the sky 1735 01:15:02,339 --> 01:15:00,369 whereas the dust signal is brighter in 1736 01:15:05,520 --> 01:15:02,349 certain region of the sky than in other 1737 01:15:07,859 --> 01:15:05,530 regions of the sky so I am a theoretical 1738 01:15:10,430 --> 01:15:07,869 physicist my job is to make predictions 1739 01:15:14,160 --> 01:15:10,440 and so I am going to make a prediction 1740 01:15:18,879 --> 01:15:14,170 my prediction is that we will figure it 1741 01:15:24,680 --> 01:15:21,950 but this is a very exciting so you know 1742 01:15:26,030 --> 01:15:24,690 back in early summer when I agreed to 1743 01:15:27,890 --> 01:15:26,040 give this talk I thought you know this 1744 01:15:29,590 --> 01:15:27,900 is gonna be the victory tour talk you 1745 01:15:31,910 --> 01:15:29,600 know we discover gravitational waves 1746 01:15:32,689 --> 01:15:31,920 someone's gonna get a Nobel Prize and 1747 01:15:34,370 --> 01:15:32,699 this is great 1748 01:15:37,370 --> 01:15:34,380 and we've you know talking about this 1749 01:15:39,350 --> 01:15:37,380 decades from now but I don't know so I 1750 01:15:41,270 --> 01:15:39,360 have to say that the arguments the 1751 01:15:43,520 --> 01:15:41,280 bicep2 gave that it's not dust we're 1752 01:15:45,649 --> 01:15:43,530 very very convincing at the time and 1753 01:15:47,510 --> 01:15:45,659 there's still many intriguing things 1754 01:15:50,689 --> 01:15:47,520 about the data that suggests that it's 1755 01:15:53,270 --> 01:15:50,699 not obviously dust but it is true that 1756 01:15:54,919 --> 01:15:53,280 since then we've realized that dust is 1757 01:15:57,890 --> 01:15:54,929 more complicated than we thought back in 1758 01:15:59,780 --> 01:15:57,900 March so we really don't know I do think 1759 01:16:02,419 --> 01:15:59,790 there's some good reason to believe that 1760 01:16:04,640 --> 01:16:02,429 we may at the end of the day be seeing 1761 01:16:06,950 --> 01:16:04,650 gravitational waves but I don't know yet 1762 01:16:08,600 --> 01:16:06,960 if these are indeed gravitational waves 1763 01:16:11,479 --> 01:16:08,610 it's as exciting as it gets 1764 01:16:13,280 --> 01:16:11,489 we're seeing some possible consequences 1765 01:16:15,890 --> 01:16:13,290 of the unification of the fundamental 1766 01:16:17,660 --> 01:16:15,900 forces at energy scales much greater 1767 01:16:19,910 --> 01:16:17,670 than those accessible with laboratory 1768 01:16:22,040 --> 01:16:19,920 experiments this would constitute the 1769 01:16:23,959 --> 01:16:22,050 first detection of gravitational waves I 1770 01:16:25,760 --> 01:16:23,969 did not mention this but these 1771 01:16:28,879 --> 01:16:25,770 gravitational waves are produced by a 1772 01:16:30,350 --> 01:16:28,889 Hawking like process in the early 1773 01:16:34,939 --> 01:16:30,360 universe so it would actually be 1774 01:16:37,280 --> 01:16:34,949 discovery of Hawking radiation the 1775 01:16:39,830 --> 01:16:37,290 physics that produces this in some sense 1776 01:16:41,419 --> 01:16:39,840 merges gravity and quantum mechanics or 1777 01:16:43,040 --> 01:16:41,429 at least scratches the surface of a 1778 01:16:45,080 --> 01:16:43,050 merger of gravity and quantum mechanics 1779 01:16:46,610 --> 01:16:45,090 and the biggest thing that theoretical 1780 01:16:49,189 --> 01:16:46,620 physicists have been trying to do in 1781 01:16:51,260 --> 01:16:49,199 20th century in 21st century science is 1782 01:16:53,209 --> 01:16:51,270 merged general relativity Einstein's 1783 01:16:56,149 --> 01:16:53,219 general relativity with the laws of 1784 01:16:58,669 --> 01:16:56,159 quantum mechanics and if this is what we 1785 01:17:01,010 --> 01:16:58,679 think it is this is actually scratching 1786 01:17:02,510 --> 01:17:01,020 the surface of what may ultimately prove 1787 01:17:04,430 --> 01:17:02,520 to be a merger between gravity and 1788 01:17:06,140 --> 01:17:04,440 quantum mechanics and perhaps most 1789 01:17:07,879 --> 01:17:06,150 exciting is that if this is what we 1790 01:17:10,220 --> 01:17:07,889 think it is if it turns out to really be 1791 01:17:12,439 --> 01:17:10,230 inflationary gravitational waves and we 1792 01:17:14,149 --> 01:17:12,449 are actually seeing a brand-new signal 1793 01:17:15,320 --> 01:17:14,159 from a trillionth of a trillionth of a 1794 01:17:18,140 --> 01:17:15,330 trillionth of a second after the Big 1795 01:17:20,600 --> 01:17:18,150 Bang and if they've detected are these B 1796 01:17:22,490 --> 01:17:20,610 modes from inflate from inflation then 1797 01:17:24,979 --> 01:17:22,500 what we've only discovered so far is a 1798 01:17:26,540 --> 01:17:24,989 rosetta stone and you know it took many 1799 01:17:28,860 --> 01:17:26,550 years after the discovery of the Rosetta 1800 01:17:31,350 --> 01:17:28,870 Stone to actually craft the code 1801 01:17:33,240 --> 01:17:31,360 figure out what's written there and over 1802 01:17:35,130 --> 01:17:33,250 the next few decades if these measures 1803 01:17:36,840 --> 01:17:35,140 if this is these are be modes we can 1804 01:17:39,120 --> 01:17:36,850 measure these be modes more precisely 1805 01:17:39,990 --> 01:17:39,130 through the same types of analyses that 1806 01:17:42,390 --> 01:17:40,000 we've done in the Cosmic Microwave 1807 01:17:44,280 --> 01:17:42,400 Background maps we have so far and we 1808 01:17:47,640 --> 01:17:44,290 have an entirely new avenue to study 1809 01:17:51,000 --> 01:17:47,650 what happened very first microsecond 1810 01:18:05,460 --> 01:17:51,010 after the Big Bang so I will close by 1811 01:18:14,800 --> 01:18:12,250 okay so y'all get all that complex feel 1812 01:18:28,660 --> 01:18:14,810 lots of cool things I'm sure there are a 1813 01:18:30,400 --> 01:18:28,670 few questions how about you should you 1814 01:18:33,520 --> 01:18:30,410 repeat the question for the webcasting 1815 01:18:35,590 --> 01:18:33,530 audience so the question is whether the 1816 01:18:36,940 --> 01:18:35,600 Cosmic Microwave Background is affected 1817 01:18:38,170 --> 01:18:36,950 by gravitational lensing 1818 01:18:40,900 --> 01:18:38,180 so this Cosmic Microwave Background 1819 01:18:42,790 --> 01:18:40,910 comes from a very large distance so this 1820 01:18:44,140 --> 01:18:42,800 light you know it's emitted from the 1821 01:18:46,510 --> 01:18:44,150 cosmic microwave background surface of 1822 01:18:48,190 --> 01:18:46,520 mascara it goes a very very long way 1823 01:18:50,710 --> 01:18:48,200 before you know we see it in our 1824 01:18:52,210 --> 01:18:50,720 telescope and it passes by a lot of 1825 01:18:54,100 --> 01:18:52,220 things a lot of galaxies and clusters of 1826 01:18:55,750 --> 01:18:54,110 galaxies and we know that general 1827 01:18:58,150 --> 01:18:55,760 relativity bends the trajectories of 1828 01:18:59,890 --> 01:18:58,160 light rays so you might ask whether that 1829 01:19:01,750 --> 01:18:59,900 Cosmic Microwave Background image is 1830 01:19:06,340 --> 01:19:01,760 distorted by this gravitational lensing 1831 01:19:08,020 --> 01:19:06,350 and it turns out that it is and this was 1832 01:19:12,010 --> 01:19:08,030 one of the big results of the Planck 1833 01:19:13,450 --> 01:19:12,020 satellite last March March of 2013 now I 1834 01:19:16,000 --> 01:19:13,460 don't have the image with me they 1835 01:19:18,850 --> 01:19:16,010 actually have measured the distribution 1836 01:19:20,050 --> 01:19:18,860 of mass in the universe by the effects 1837 01:19:22,060 --> 01:19:20,060 of gravitational and by the 1838 01:19:24,070 --> 01:19:22,070 gravitational lensing distortions of the 1839 01:19:26,680 --> 01:19:24,080 Cosmic Microwave Background so the 1840 01:19:29,340 --> 01:19:26,690 answer is yes and it's one of the the 1841 01:19:42,040 --> 01:19:29,350 major triumphs of the Planck satellite 1842 01:19:44,860 --> 01:19:42,050 okay other questions so there are 1843 01:19:47,080 --> 01:19:44,870 different ideas about what it is and 1844 01:19:50,020 --> 01:19:47,090 most of it is probably silicates and 1845 01:19:54,790 --> 01:19:50,030 these dust particles have a wide variety 1846 01:19:57,310 --> 01:19:54,800 of sizes but a micron is a typical size 1847 01:20:01,090 --> 01:19:57,320 so like they're they're much smaller 1848 01:20:03,310 --> 01:20:01,100 than sand particles I think you know if 1849 01:20:05,530 --> 01:20:03,320 you take a to talk to erasers filled 1850 01:20:06,970 --> 01:20:05,540 with talk and bang them I think that 1851 01:20:12,669 --> 01:20:06,980 those chalk dust particles are 1852 01:20:19,419 --> 01:20:14,890 it's you know tens of grams per 1853 01:20:22,600 --> 01:20:19,429 centimeter cubed it's like sand so very 1854 01:20:24,850 --> 01:20:22,610 small we don't know what it is in detail 1855 01:20:28,629 --> 01:20:24,860 there are various ideas and then it also 1856 01:20:31,629 --> 01:20:28,639 merges into things called PAH molecules 1857 01:20:34,930 --> 01:20:31,639 so a very small dust particle finds up 1858 01:20:37,000 --> 01:20:34,940 looking like a very big molecule but 1859 01:20:44,260 --> 01:20:37,010 basically it's you know dust like you 1860 01:20:47,350 --> 01:20:44,270 know a chalkboard dust gravitational 1861 01:20:58,270 --> 01:20:47,360 waves turn out to be some source of 1862 01:21:00,339 --> 01:20:58,280 humongous amounts of energy is whether 1863 01:21:02,260 --> 01:21:00,349 the gravitational waves might turn out 1864 01:21:05,169 --> 01:21:02,270 to be a huge source of energy that we 1865 01:21:07,209 --> 01:21:05,179 could tap into so the answer is no so 1866 01:21:08,830 --> 01:21:07,219 the there are upper limits to the energy 1867 01:21:11,169 --> 01:21:08,840 density of these gravitational waves and 1868 01:21:12,760 --> 01:21:11,179 the the best upper limit is that it's 1869 01:21:14,260 --> 01:21:12,770 one tenth of the energy density in the 1870 01:21:17,310 --> 01:21:14,270 Cosmic Microwave Background 1871 01:21:22,750 --> 01:21:17,320 and that's a very small energy density 1872 01:21:25,930 --> 01:21:22,760 so the roughly 400 sir roughly 400 1873 01:21:28,870 --> 01:21:25,940 photons per cubic centimeter and there 1874 01:21:31,629 --> 01:21:28,880 are very long wavelengths are very low 1875 01:21:34,419 --> 01:21:31,639 energy photons more difficult part is 1876 01:21:36,490 --> 01:21:34,429 the tap into question detecting the 1877 01:21:38,560 --> 01:21:36,500 gravitational wave is extremely 1878 01:21:40,149 --> 01:21:38,570 difficult the motions that these 1879 01:21:45,549 --> 01:21:40,159 gravitational waves would induce and 1880 01:21:48,220 --> 01:21:45,559 test masses is extremely feeble and just 1881 01:21:51,970 --> 01:21:48,230 the idea of getting energy from waves is 1882 01:21:54,370 --> 01:21:51,980 tricky so Tesla had this idea so Tesla 1883 01:21:55,930 --> 01:21:54,380 was a genius but he's also a semi not he 1884 01:21:58,330 --> 01:21:55,940 had this idea that we could do energy 1885 01:22:01,600 --> 01:21:58,340 transmission not by laying cables but by 1886 01:22:03,609 --> 01:22:01,610 a propagating radio waves and it didn't 1887 01:22:06,919 --> 01:22:03,619 work and he blew up several things 1888 01:22:12,779 --> 01:22:10,319 forty orders of magnitude longer than 1889 01:22:15,180 --> 01:22:12,789 gravitational waves so if we can't do 1890 01:22:21,720 --> 01:22:15,190 with electromagnetic waves it's not hey 1891 01:22:24,629 --> 01:22:21,730 40 orders just a bit over here this sort 1892 01:22:27,350 --> 01:22:24,639 of follow-up to the first question how 1893 01:22:31,379 --> 01:22:27,360 do we know that sort of the image of the 1894 01:22:33,510 --> 01:22:31,389 microwave pattern mentioned by Coby and 1895 01:22:36,000 --> 01:22:33,520 the subsequent satellites has not been 1896 01:22:40,970 --> 01:22:36,010 distorted by other intervening sources 1897 01:22:43,649 --> 01:22:40,980 of microwave or so it turns out that the 1898 01:22:46,109 --> 01:22:43,659 predictions of inflation for the Cosmic 1899 01:22:51,529 --> 01:22:46,119 Microwave Background pattern are very 1900 01:22:54,779 --> 01:22:51,539 very precise and the prediction is that 1901 01:22:57,930 --> 01:22:54,789 the image should be a what we call the 1902 01:23:00,180 --> 01:22:57,940 Gaussian random map so it's a very very 1903 01:23:03,089 --> 01:23:00,190 specific prediction so you know what a 1904 01:23:04,620 --> 01:23:03,099 bell curve is right bell curve goes up 1905 01:23:07,850 --> 01:23:04,630 and it goes down has a very precise 1906 01:23:11,430 --> 01:23:07,860 mathematical description anything else 1907 01:23:12,990 --> 01:23:11,440 is not a bell curve so if I draw a curve 1908 01:23:14,310 --> 01:23:13,000 that goes like that that's not a bell 1909 01:23:16,080 --> 01:23:14,320 curve if I draw a triangle it's not a 1910 01:23:18,359 --> 01:23:16,090 bell curve a square is not a bell curve 1911 01:23:20,549 --> 01:23:18,369 anything that's not a bell curve is not 1912 01:23:23,010 --> 01:23:20,559 a bell curve and anything that's not a 1913 01:23:26,000 --> 01:23:23,020 Gaussian random map is not a Gaussian 1914 01:23:30,000 --> 01:23:26,010 random map and it turns out that the the 1915 01:23:33,660 --> 01:23:30,010 images are Gaussian to one part in 1916 01:23:36,029 --> 01:23:33,670 10,000 so we know that the distortions 1917 01:23:38,040 --> 01:23:36,039 are extremely small but we now can't 1918 01:23:41,520 --> 01:23:38,050 detect these very tiniest or seems very 1919 01:23:43,560 --> 01:23:41,530 tiny distortions we can attribute very 1920 01:23:47,569 --> 01:23:43,570 precisely to the effects of 1921 01:23:50,850 --> 01:23:47,579 gravitational lensing in the back there 1922 01:23:53,220 --> 01:23:50,860 just a simple question but the on the B 1923 01:23:54,629 --> 01:23:53,230 modes but that create bumps on the 1924 01:23:56,700 --> 01:23:54,639 outside edges 1925 01:24:00,779 --> 01:23:56,710 maybe I'm saying it simply but the 1926 01:24:03,240 --> 01:24:00,789 outside edges of where you have 1927 01:24:05,010 --> 01:24:03,250 inflation if you had one picture where 1928 01:24:07,859 --> 01:24:05,020 there was like kind of a a ball with 1929 01:24:11,069 --> 01:24:07,869 spirals well those B modes actually 1930 01:24:13,379 --> 01:24:11,079 rotate and create like dimples on the 1931 01:24:15,060 --> 01:24:13,389 outside edge or how does that work it's 1932 01:24:17,720 --> 01:24:15,070 the other way around so what happens is 1933 01:24:20,640 --> 01:24:17,730 that there's surface of last scattering 1934 01:24:23,069 --> 01:24:20,650 the light that we see from in the Cosmic 1935 01:24:26,609 --> 01:24:23,079 Microwave Background is actually emitted 1936 01:24:28,799 --> 01:24:26,619 from the surface of last scattering it 1937 01:24:31,439 --> 01:24:28,809 comes in it starts jiggling starts 1938 01:24:33,060 --> 01:24:31,449 moving it around and those motions are 1939 01:24:37,140 --> 01:24:33,070 what gives rise to the polarization 1940 01:24:38,370 --> 01:24:37,150 pattern so it's those motions induced by 1941 01:24:41,520 --> 01:24:38,380 the gravitational waves give rise to 1942 01:24:47,339 --> 01:24:41,530 that polarization pattern not vice versa 1943 01:24:48,930 --> 01:24:47,349 I was just asking well that is their 1944 01:24:51,660 --> 01:24:48,940 varying density or something that's 1945 01:24:53,129 --> 01:24:51,670 creating that and and is it a flat wall 1946 01:24:55,049 --> 01:24:53,139 on the outside edge of that or is it 1947 01:24:56,790 --> 01:24:55,059 something that that that energy goes 1948 01:25:01,049 --> 01:24:56,800 both directions or is it only coming one 1949 01:25:02,640 --> 01:25:01,059 way oh it's going in all directions but 1950 01:25:10,259 --> 01:25:02,650 we only the see the stuff that's coming 1951 01:25:14,069 --> 01:25:10,269 towards us okay yeah question here Hey 1952 01:25:16,470 --> 01:25:14,079 in this the COBE and w map actin and 1953 01:25:20,279 --> 01:25:16,480 puck background radiation 1954 01:25:22,979 --> 01:25:20,289 you mentioned hotter and colder 1955 01:25:27,240 --> 01:25:22,989 is that a spectral or an intensity or is 1956 01:25:29,009 --> 01:25:27,250 it the same difference so hotter and 1957 01:25:33,029 --> 01:25:29,019 colder means brighter what I should have 1958 01:25:34,410 --> 01:25:33,039 said is brighter and fainter that's an 1959 01:25:35,990 --> 01:25:34,420 intensity measurement or is it a 1960 01:25:37,259 --> 01:25:36,000 specular the difference in frequency 1961 01:25:42,270 --> 01:25:37,269 wavelength 1962 01:25:43,560 --> 01:25:42,280 it's an intensity measurement and I can 1963 01:25:45,870 --> 01:25:43,570 tell you more if you want more detailed 1964 01:25:47,370 --> 01:25:45,880 information about how what precise 1965 01:25:55,109 --> 01:25:47,380 they're measuring but it's an intensity 1966 01:25:57,359 --> 01:25:55,119 measurement okay lights because the 1967 01:25:59,850 --> 01:25:57,369 speed of light is what is faster than 1968 01:26:01,709 --> 01:25:59,860 the rate of that car and you just said 1969 01:26:03,120 --> 01:26:01,719 we can't see things going away from us 1970 01:26:05,279 --> 01:26:03,130 so you've said all the galaxies are 1971 01:26:07,109 --> 01:26:05,289 moving faster than the speed of light so 1972 01:26:13,080 --> 01:26:07,119 we can't see things moving away from us 1973 01:26:14,910 --> 01:26:13,090 oh we're moving in this direction and 1974 01:26:16,919 --> 01:26:14,920 everything's expanding we should be 1975 01:26:19,470 --> 01:26:16,929 looking this way and not see anything 1976 01:26:21,779 --> 01:26:19,480 but if we look back the other way we 1977 01:26:24,689 --> 01:26:21,789 should see you know things coming 1978 01:26:25,830 --> 01:26:24,699 towards us unless they should be a 1979 01:26:28,410 --> 01:26:25,840 little bit more dense 1980 01:26:30,870 --> 01:26:28,420 so now that you've told me about the Big 1981 01:26:33,300 --> 01:26:30,880 Bang it makes me think that whatever 1982 01:26:35,100 --> 01:26:33,310 that source is over here there's not one 1983 01:26:37,310 --> 01:26:35,110 Big Bang it makes it seem like this a 1984 01:26:39,480 --> 01:26:37,320 series of things so that additional 1985 01:26:42,240 --> 01:26:39,490 matter would be released from that 1986 01:26:44,100 --> 01:26:42,250 source like you know peeling an onion 1987 01:26:47,160 --> 01:26:44,110 and now you've has layers of one layer 1988 01:26:49,080 --> 01:26:47,170 bangs the next layer bangs the next 1989 01:26:51,030 --> 01:26:49,090 layer so that when we look that way 1990 01:26:53,880 --> 01:26:51,040 we don't see anything but when we look 1991 01:26:58,430 --> 01:26:53,890 back we can still see matters upcoming 1992 01:27:02,300 --> 01:26:58,440 tours okay so this is so the 1993 01:27:05,100 --> 01:27:02,310 understanding the Big Bang 1994 01:27:08,580 --> 01:27:05,110 it's probably the it's the hardest thing 1995 01:27:11,040 --> 01:27:08,590 to explain and to understand and I had 1996 01:27:19,370 --> 01:27:11,050 to take general relativity and cosmology 1997 01:27:24,450 --> 01:27:22,110 explosions so the Big Bang is all often 1998 01:27:25,920 --> 01:27:24,460 described as an explosion but it's kind 1999 01:27:27,960 --> 01:27:25,930 of a misnomer because when we think of 2000 01:27:30,510 --> 01:27:27,970 explosions you know we think of 2001 01:27:34,580 --> 01:27:30,520 something over there blowing up and then 2002 01:27:36,960 --> 01:27:34,590 we see it but that's not the big bang 2003 01:27:40,650 --> 01:27:36,970 what we observe is that the entire 2004 01:27:45,060 --> 01:27:40,660 universe is expanding imagine that I had 2005 01:27:48,030 --> 01:27:45,070 a balloon that was very small and I were 2006 01:27:49,950 --> 01:27:48,040 to I blew it up slowly and think about 2007 01:27:55,890 --> 01:27:49,960 the surface which is a two-dimensional 2008 01:27:57,960 --> 01:27:55,900 universe every point on that universe is 2009 01:27:59,520 --> 01:27:57,970 moving away from every other point every 2010 01:28:01,590 --> 01:27:59,530 point on the surface the balloon is 2011 01:28:05,490 --> 01:28:01,600 moving away from every other points as I 2012 01:28:06,840 --> 01:28:05,500 blow it up but there is no place on the 2013 01:28:11,250 --> 01:28:06,850 balloon that's different than any other 2014 01:28:13,770 --> 01:28:11,260 place and the expanding universe is a 2015 01:28:31,190 --> 01:28:13,780 three dimensional analog of the surface 2016 01:28:34,550 --> 01:28:33,020 the circuits have another bubble and 2017 01:28:37,100 --> 01:28:34,560 they started a balloon and they're all 2018 01:28:38,600 --> 01:28:37,110 expanding yeah we can't do that so so so 2019 01:28:41,720 --> 01:28:38,610 the problem with this analogy is that 2020 01:28:44,360 --> 01:28:41,730 when we look at the the balloon it's a 2021 01:28:46,220 --> 01:28:44,370 two-dimensional surface that we can see 2022 01:28:49,040 --> 01:28:46,230 because we're in three dimensions and 2023 01:28:50,600 --> 01:28:49,050 for this analogy to work really well we 2024 01:28:51,410 --> 01:28:50,610 would have to live in four dimensions 2025 01:28:53,780 --> 01:28:51,420 and be able to look at our 2026 01:28:56,210 --> 01:28:53,790 three-dimensional universe from outside 2027 01:28:59,240 --> 01:28:56,220 it we can talk afterwards I can try to 2028 01:29:02,780 --> 01:28:59,250 explain the expansion of expansion 2029 01:29:05,510 --> 01:29:02,790 spaces be the stretching of space and 2030 01:29:08,420 --> 01:29:05,520 not really moving through space is one 2031 01:29:10,250 --> 01:29:08,430 of the fundamental pieces that you have 2032 01:29:11,870 --> 01:29:10,260 to grasp in order for a lot of this to 2033 01:29:20,270 --> 01:29:11,880 some of this to make sense all right 2034 01:29:23,510 --> 01:29:20,280 we've hit at a good amount of time next 2035 01:29:28,760 --> 01:29:23,520 month December we will have Joshua peak 2036 01:29:31,760 --> 01:29:28,770 on outer space the landing on the 2037 01:29:35,270 --> 01:29:31,770 Rosetta on comet rubber ducky cheerio 2038 01:29:36,770 --> 01:29:35,280 mom Gerasimenko is like what did we 2039 01:29:37,460 --> 01:29:36,780 figure out was 11 a.m. tomorrow or 2040 01:29:41,780 --> 01:29:37,470 something like that 2041 01:29:43,700 --> 01:29:41,790 Eastern Time and somebody put up here 2042 01:29:48,170 --> 01:29:43,710 that Adam riess is getting yet another 2043 01:29:50,030 --> 01:29:48,180 prize and it's going to be simulcast on 2044 01:29:52,820 --> 01:29:50,040 the Discovery Channel and Science 2045 01:29:54,530 --> 01:29:52,830 Channel 6 p.m. Saturday with hosted by 2046 01:29:57,440 --> 01:29:54,540 Seth MacFarlane and other things like 2047 01:29:58,970 --> 01:29:57,450 that so you want to see yet another 2048 01:30:00,530 --> 01:29:58,980 thing for Adam riess go ahead alright